PDA

View Full Version : Nazi War Criminal 'Beast of Bolzano' dies


Military Times
9th November 2010, 17:46
The former SS prison Guard Michael Seifert, known as the 'Beast of Bolzano' has just died in an Italian hospital aged 86. He was convicted of 11 counts of murder for crimes supposedly committed between 1944-45. See article on him here:

http://www.military-times.co.uk/articles/news/nazi-war-criminal-dies.htm

He only served about 2 years - Which other war criminals have evaded justice?

Sylvester Stadler
10th November 2010, 02:25
You ask which war criminal evaded justice. The answer is: WINSTON CHURCHILL whom I classify as The Political Serial Killer.

There are several types of serial killers which are categorized and studied by the FBI. The backgrounds of such killers have amazingly similar backgrounds which reach back to their childhoods. As children they were unable to do well in school and they came from dysfunctional families in that they were neglegted by either one of the parents or both of the parents. Such problems indicated that their adult careers would be categorized by aggression. Another characteristic is that such individuals have a lack of remorse for their sins, transgressions and crimes.

There should be another category which the FBI has not included in its list and that is the political serial killer, the type of which has the background of the serial killer, but is of the type who does not do his own killing but goes into politics in order to give the commands which result in the deaths of specific groups of people which the politician desires to wipe out. The reason is either that he lacks the courage to do the killing himself or he wishes that more people to be killed than he could ever accomplish for himself.

Such an individual is none other than Winston Churchill who grew up as a child severely neglected by both his mother and father who were never around when he needed their love and affection. The parents were more interested in their own lives than to be bothered by their offspring and so they handed him off to the nannies to be raised by different personalities and he would never have that role model that children require, as if Lord Randolph Churchill was the type to be emulated. The result would manifest itself in his actions and words in the future. He would have bouts of depression and resort heavily to the bottle. His academic career at Harrow was poor, even though he had the innate qualities and high intelligence. He would marry a woman who was equally depressed with a dysfunctional childhood and with whom he could be miserable.

Churchill's life would be dominated by a rage within his mind for which the outlet would be to have others suffer due to his lack of a proper upbringing. He would join the army and go to Africa where, in the Sudan, he rejoiced in the slaughter by modern weaponry of the dervishers at Omdurman in 1898. He would resign his commission and as a journalist fail to condemn the concentration camps in South Africa during the Boer War where some 25,000 old men, women and children would die due to British policy. He would be the driving force to have Great Britain enter the First World War against Germany and also take action to mobilize the Royal Navy before war was even declared. As First Lord of the Admiralty he developed the policy of the food blockade which resulted in some 750,000 German civilians dying of starvation. This food blockade was continued for some six months after the November 11, 1918 armistice and as Minister for War, he did nothing to stop the blockade. And he never expressed one word of sympathy for these victims.

During WW 1 Churchill's policy at Gallipolli failed and he was forced to resign. He reentered the British Army and was appointed a battalion commander with the rank of Lt. Col. Evidently, he decided that he did not want to be a statistic on the western front and this lasted only for two months, January to March, 1916, and he resigned again to return to politics to further the war against civilians instead of soldiers.

After WW 1 he had recommended the use of poison gases against the tribesmen of Iraq, even though by then the civilized world had recoiled in the use of such weapons. During WW 2 he advocated the use of anthrax against Germany, hoping that five million Germans would die as a result. He was a proponent of the Morganthau Plan which would have reduced the German population to 25 million. He sold out Eastern Europe to mass murderer Stalin and his policy to return the Cossacks to Stalin to be exterminated meant nothing the Churchill, who never once showed any remorse for the deaths of civilians as a result of his own philosophy. He never cared about the death of one Frenchman who was killed by Churchill's order to attack the French fleet at Oran or the tens of thousands killed by RAF Bomber Command's attacks on French cities or on the deaths of thousands of Belgians, Dutch, Norwegians, Danes, etc. by the bombing attacks. And he certainly had no remorse of the hundreds of thousands of German civilians who died in the bombing attacks, which he personally ordered. This is the same individual who claimed that he liked Stalin whom he characterized as a great man. One dysfunctional man praising another dysfunctional man.

Churchill's record as a political serial killer is consistent throughout his life, from his dysfunctional personality beginning with his childhood and through to the end of his life, during which time he never showed one ounce of sympathy for his victims even though he claimed that he represented Christian civilization.

Pilot
10th November 2010, 12:36
Churchill is responsible for the bringing communist regime into the leadership in my country... you know what was results for a decades and still is persistent. It is well known that top people who control the world will be never get to justice, they live and die as untouchable.

John Beaman
10th November 2010, 15:45
OK guys, the posting was strictly an informational posting about the death of SS prison Guard Michael Seifert. It WAS NOT an open invitation for you to air your opinions about who was or was not a war criminal. Keep the discussion on subject or I will close the thread.

Pilot
10th November 2010, 20:56
All right, sorry :(

Brian
11th November 2010, 23:25
Sylvester

You're talking (or writing) through your arse!

And, no, I won't apologise to you.

Brian