PDA

View Full Version : Photos +, part two 1/15/05


edwest
16th January 2005, 05:11
Me 109
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146424401
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146893353
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146642238

Misc.
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146942789
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146515720
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146514858
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146287475
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146231519
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146227301
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146402482

Portrait
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146837778
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146836841

Flugbuch
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146833829
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146833202

Purportedly original Ar 234 flight report
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146831906

Do 17E handbook
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146832330

Puportedly original Junkers document concerning Jumo 213 for Fw 190 D-9
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146832736

Purportedly original flight orders document for Me 210
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146835185

Handbook for soldiers relating to airfield duties
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6146854677

Plaque
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6505421661




Usual disclaimer,
Ed

Primoz
16th January 2005, 16:13
The first Misc. is a standard early He 111.
The last Misc. ("Arado, Nr. 142") is an ex-Austrian Fiat CR.32

Don Pearson
16th January 2005, 20:29
2nd 109...

This aircraft is shown in "Die Jagdfliegerverbände...vol 5" from Prien et al, belonging to 2. Erg./JG 51, as noted in 1941 at La Rochelle.

Don

Jim P.
17th January 2005, 16:10
..

Ruy Horta
17th January 2005, 20:38
Unlike the previous board I recommend that you use the message body instead of the subject to make a short remark, with this new forum the previous effect has been lost.

edwest
17th January 2005, 23:45
What do you mean by short remark? "part one" "part two"?


Ed

Peter D Evans
18th January 2005, 00:09
Don't worry Ed, Ruys post is aimed at Jim P and not you... :D

Peter D Evans
LEMB - moderator