![]() |
Re: Bf 109E-4
Quote:
I suspect those 'E-4' with the old canopy are in many cases E-3s... the August 1940 strenght reports show large number of E-1s and E-4s and few E-3s around - the only logical conclusion is that many E-3s after getting the MG-FF/M were also 'officially' restamped/designated as E-4s. Out of curiousity, which version of the DB 601A did the E-4s gets? A-1 or Aa? I believe the E-7s had the Aa as standard. |
Re: Bf 109E-4
Quote:
Junker |
Re: Bf 109E-4
Just a thought, but didn't the E-4 have the nose-cannon removed? I have a reference book here that says so..................I have also read that on the models that did have the nose cannon, they were not successful?
|
Re: Bf 109E-4
Quote:
Junker |
Re: Bf 109E-4
Thanks, Junkers ;)
|
Re: Bf 109E-4
Hi to all!:)
How some specimens of Bf 109 E will be equipped with (sub)variants of engines, armament, canopies... etc. not only depend what proposed by designer than also what available in the moment of production. It is also the same story when wrecked aircraft repaired. That repeated with later variants of Bf 109 even more than previous. So the features pointed out in documents understand only as guidelines but not as absolute truth. Kind regards Newcomer |
Re: Bf 109E-4
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net