Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum - Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)

- Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)

- - Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=36809)

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

Hello Jim,

I meant exactly that as understatement.
Start to be obvious when you brought the "amen"! But for Matti? No problem, it was already "obvious" :)
I liked that.

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim P. (Post 180082)

Bf 109G-6, 440723, KEMETHMÜLLER, Ofhr. Heinz, 89, III., 9., JG 26, weiße, 1 + |, , , 10-Apr-44, Transit flight to Etain on this date.., RK., FR, FB H. Kemethmüller, , Fl.Pl. Vendeville, -, H, , ,

Hmmm ... the W.Nr.440723 I have with an training flight in Neubiberg on 17.04.1944, the a/c from 10.04.1944 was the W.Nr.440662.

Best regards
Rasmussen

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

If you can resolve this question, I'll correct my web site!

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasmussen (Post 180103)

Hmmm ... the W.Nr.440723 I have with an training flight in Neubiberg on 17.04.1944, the a/c from 10.04.1944 was the W.Nr.440662.

Best regards
Rasmussen

And? Sorry but, and? ... "Allô?, non mais Allô quoi!"

What are the consequences of that on the "740723" transmitted by Nick's site?
Still Weisse 1 of 9./JG 26 during the same (even better) laps of time.

Did Jim got his references from a secondary source?
Did Rasmussen got his references from the same FB? (would be surprising to find TWO FBs)

This is what I call "the collateral damages of the sibilline team"!

At least, I prefer a wrong but clear and honest WNr. given by Nick than one "I know but I won't tell you".

Another Browny job!

Last: at least Rasmussen can you give us the other data concerning those two flights you're talking about? Thanks for your help.

Regards, Franck.

PS: In these conditions Nick is right saying "If you can resolve this question, I'll correct my web site!"

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

Quote:

Originally Posted by ouidjat (Post 180137)

What are the consequences of that on the "740723" transmitted by Nick's site?

What's your problem, ouidjat?

Of course it hadn't to do with an complete other time frame or such an thing. It was an little annotation to Jim's post, an question maybe because my source was the same: an copy of the Kemethmüller flightbook ... not more not less.

No reason for your pathetic answer.

Best regards
Rasmussen

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

See attached - from the FB -

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

Ahh ... damned. I slipped in my computer list one line from 10th to 11th. We have the same copy.

Best regards
Rasmussen

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

Rasmussen, as you may have noticed, from time to time ouidjat/Franck likes to be a bit contrary. I don't have a problem with that - it keeps the rest of on our toes so to speak.

Re: Bf 109 740 xxx and 748 xxx production batch

It helps "to push"! :)
Result of that? You discovered your misread Ras.!

Thanks for the help gentlemen.

Regards, Franck.

PS: In the mean time, trying to download a file through Wetransfer in a Chinese hotel and writing comments in TOCH is an athletic business Gr....