![]() |
Re: Clostermann official score
I always wondered why he had that letter from Broadhurst. I don't remember reading that any other 2TAF pilot had (or requested) one, or did every successful pilot receive such a letter from the Air Marshal?
|
Re: Clostermann official score
Quote:
I checked the TNA 24/653 Statistics of Combats and Casualties in ADGB., Fighter Command and 2 TAF; Vol 4. For 2nd TAF the pages have the title “2nd T.A.F. Log of casualty and claims, assessments and losses”. I expect that it should contain the same information as TNA AIR 37/5. For most of the dates it has the same info as “2TAF EAL” but for the 3rd of May there are a few differences: 3/5/45 3 1 x Fw190 DES on the ground (FALSE) X-X-X-X-X (3 Sqn pilots Walker & West each claimed a Fw190 DES on the ground and these appear to be the only two such claims credited to 3 Sqn) – TNA AIR 24/653: Final assessment 1 DES + notes made with pencil “GR” for all claims on this date 2 x Fw190 DAM on the ground (FALSE) X-X-X-X-X (2 such claims by 3 Sqn are acknowledged in a tabular summary for 3/5/45 in TNA AIR 37/829. I suspect these will be listed in TNA AIR 37/5, and might identify Clostermann) - TNA 24/653: Final assessment 2 Dam 2 x Do24 DES on the ground or water (CR) (1 DEST, 1 DAM listed in 2TAF EAL) – TNA AIR 24/653: Final assessment 2 DES 1 x Ju352 DES on the ground or water (CR) (1 DAM listed in 2TAF EAL) – TNA AIR 24/653: Final assessment 1 DES 2 x Bv138 DAM on the ground or water (CR) – TNA AIR 24/653: Final assessment 2 Dam 2 x Ar232 DAM on the ground or water (CR) – TNA AIR 24/653: Final assessment 2 Dam Cheers, Peter |
Re: Clostermann official score
Nick
As far we do not know, if there were any more such documents, so we cannot say if they were unique or not. As far as I can tell, I have seen odd surviving documents like FC confirmation of 7 Dec 1944 victory dated 29 Jan 1945 (I think) for F/S Bargiełowski. Certainly there were such papers issued for each victory but I have seen only this one surviving. So, I have seen a FC document pertaining 9 Apr 1945 victory of S/L Żulikowski, asking to withdraw claim for probable and to ammend it as destroyed, because examination of gun camera film showed German pilot bailing out - with both versions of PCR included. Another interesting set is concerning 8 Nov 1940 501 Sqn victory, it contains a ROC report on German crashes which resulted in filing the claim and crediting it to the Squadron, and 1942 amendment, attributing it to individual pilots. I do not need to mention that some documents pertaining to blue on blue were also removed from files and just few survived. Again, those are odd documents that survived, and there are some more, but bulk of them seemingly was lost. Rod I agree that this is quite confusing but we would have to assume that either Broadhurst provided false information for some reason or that Clostermann faked the document. I do not see a reason for that, hence the enigma. Franek |
Re: Clostermann official score
Quote:
My original post relied on the one tabular file (TNA 37/829) I originally made notes from, and it has errors. TNA AIR 37/692 is more complete and more verbose. In looking at what you've posted, Clostermann had three damaged claims on 3 May 1945 upgraded to destroyed. TNA AIR 37/692 (claimed): 1 x FW.190 DEST, 2 x FW.190 DAM on the ground. TNA AIR 24/653 (assessed as): 1 x FW.190 DEST, 2 x FW.190 DAM on the ground. TNA AIR 37/692 (claimed): 1 Do.24 DEST, 1 Do.24 DAM, 2 BV.138 DAM, 2 Ar.232 DAM, 1 Ju.352 DAM on the ground. TNA AIR 24/653 (assessed as): 2 Do.24 DEST, 2 BV.138 DAM, 2 Ar.232 DAM, 1 Ju.352 DEST on the ground. |
Re: Clostermann official score
Quote:
I haven't seen the document, so I cannot comment. I don't know if it was a document that Clostermann requested and Broadhurst provided, or a document that Clostermann prepared and got Broadhurst to sign. I guess in terms of your original request, it's impossible to assess possible Luftwaffe adversaries/victims if a listed claim is bogus and never happened. At this stage, I know this seemingly applies to the Bf109s claimed on 14 March 1945 and the Ju88 claimed on 5 April 1945. And, of course, air claims need sorted from ground claims. Cheers Rod |
Re: Clostermann official score
Quote:
I forgot to mention that the original claims were also included in AIR 24/653 and these were identical to AIR 37/692. It is therefore clear that the claims were upgraded based additional information. |
Re: Clostermann official score
Quote:
If he either requested or prepared that letter, was he perhaps looking to address or pre-empt questioning of his record? As for claims, his book's (vividly depicted) episode where on patrol over Remagen he pursues an Me 262 seems to correspond to nothing in the records of 122 Wing, his Squadron or Luftwaffenkommado West. |
Re: Clostermann official score
Quote:
I know AIR 37/5 has the claim assessment results implicitly given, and I expect these assessments were done using analysis of the gun camera film (and possibly also results of photographic aerial reconnaissance). |
Re: Clostermann official score
..Clostermann's 'document' perhaps?
" My two DFC citations, by Air Marshal Slessor and AOC 83 Group Sir Harry Broadhurst, are enough for me" - "DFC 26/8/44 This officer has displayed outstanding courage and devotion to duty throughout his operational career in the course of which he has destroyed at least 11 enemy aircraft and damaged other military objectives". "Bar 28/5/45 since being awarded the DFC this officer has participated in 70 new operational missions during which he has destroyed a further 12 enemy aircraft. Throughout, Lieutenant Clostermann has displayed outstanding courage and ability, and has proved to be a source of inspiration to all". " 23 black crosses ..[on my Tempest..] and 23 confirmed by my DFC citations. I never personally asked for anything else.... " |
Re: Clostermann official score
"PREFACE
So every evening I used to write down for [my parents] the events of the day in a fat Air Ministry notebook stamped 'G.R.' … these notes—by the end of the war they filled three books—were always with me … I simply jotted down day by day the impressions, the fleetingly-caught incidents so sharply imprinted on my memory … It is precisely becasue they are true, because they were written in the first flush of action that I have made no attempt to re-touch these notes." That true is italicised in the original, so I'd like to see what his notebooks said about the episode in The Big Show crept in where 2 TAF Tempests are called on to patrol over Remagen and Clostermann finds himself "face to face with an absolute armada of seven or eight Arado 234's escorted by thirty or so Me 262's diving down on that miserable bridge." He is then thrown into a spin when he passes too close to the explosion of an Arado's bomb and, after recovering pursues and damages an Me 262. An exciting read but a set of events I have not been able to corroborate from the ORBS of 122 Wing or its Squadrons, let alone the Luftwaffenkommando West situation reports. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net