Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Page 3 of 4

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)

- Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)

- - ME 109 Rheims September 1944 (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=41633)

ouidjat

23rd May 2015 20:24

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Quote:

Originally Posted by edNorth (Post 201213)

Was this not Bf 109 G-6 Franck ?

I know ME-109 is incorrect writing.

;-)

PS. I publicly protest, am able post "without problems" in Bf 109 thread but Ju 88 thread has technical problem in 5 out of 7 tries.
I too suffer from "stubbornness", but that has helped research the Ju 88 series....

Ah ah ah !

edNorth

23rd May 2015 21:51

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Ah, aah aah ;-) and reminded me of this camo scheme. For night flying?

http://www.mc-hobbyshop.com/en/catal.../image/130385/

ouidjat

23rd May 2015 23:07

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Quote:

Originally Posted by edNorth (Post 201226)

Ah, aah aah ;-) and reminded me of this camo scheme. For night flying?

http://www.mc-hobbyshop.com/en/catal.../image/130385/

Black Belt in "Google-fu" helps ;-)

So what?
So what's your problem Ed Morse ??
Just one point I never ever insulted bodies here
So what's up with you?
Are you that Superior that you can think you can considerer people from the heights of your tipicaly English coldness?

Doing that you just prove you're pathetic!

edNorth

23rd May 2015 23:14

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Excuse. No insault intended. ;-) was intended as "joking Sign".
I am NOT watching Eurovision now, that may possibly be the reson... Find it BORING.
Are you insaulted becuse I suggested this be NJG machne?
Or are YOU "Bf 109" not expert, or do you disagree.
I can not figure this out from your answer.
Again I apologise.

waldo_pepper

24th May 2015 02:07

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc-André Haldimann (Post 201154)

A most interesting shot, Waldo Pepper:

Bf 109 G-6/AS W.Nr. 162080 "RW+EC" "Grüne 9", Stab JG 11 (?), Reims-Champagne, Fall 1944. Source: AI2(G) Serial 255.

Was it found on a website or is it from your collection ? Whatever, many thanks!

Cheers
Marc

Hello Marc,

it is originally from the web, I had it on an old hard drive and found it while searching for other images. Nice to know it is not common and happy to provide a small offering to the knowledgeable members here whose efforts I respect immensely.
regards
Bill

waldo_pepper

24th May 2015 02:10

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

1 Attachment(s)

Another view of the same aircraft.
regards
Bill.

Nick Beale

24th May 2015 11:06

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Quote:

Originally Posted by ouidjat (Post 201232)

What the hell is the matter with you? Ed makes a simple comment about a paint scheme and you manage — God knows how — to extrapolate all that from it? Are you just trying to get a really interesting thread locked, or what?

I suggest you calm down before you post again.

Marc-André Haldimann

24th May 2015 11:31

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Hi there Bill,

Another gift ! Many many thanks !!! Any others lingering on your hard drive ?

Cheers
Marc

Nick Beale

24th May 2015 11:51

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

Unlike some people (Hi, Ferdinando!) I'm no good on the details of Bf 109 anatomy but isn't that a deeper than usual intake for a G-6 series, more like a G-10? Or would you expect this on an aircraft with the AS engine?

veltro

24th May 2015 12:17

Re: ME 109 Rheims September 1944

In fact, Nick (hi!) to me it is mainly a matter of deductive reasoning: such deeper oil radiator had nothing to do with a normal DB 605A, and since none of the visual characteristics of the DB 605D are present (namely higher nose oil hatch round cover and either chin-bulges under the cowl or a completely modified Erla nose section... not to mention place and time of the finding), the DB 605AS simply had to be the culprit...

Of course with the Bf 109 nothing is ever so simple, but when it apparently is, why choose the more complicate way?

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:17.

Page 3 of 4

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page