Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Allied and Soviet Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Bell P-39 top ten ace list (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=47977)

knusel 2nd February 2019 20:09

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
Good evening Gentlemen,

can anybody tell me the dates and/or decimals of the 3+3shared Alexandr Pokryshkin claims that are not listed in this list ?
http://soviet-aces-1936-53.ru/abc/p/pokryshkin.htm

Cheers,

Michael

edwest2 2nd February 2019 21:57

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
I hope the following adds some details.


https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/...ed-challenges/


https://www.pacificwrecks.com/aircra...9/42-4287.html

Håkan 4th February 2019 10:23

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
Regarding Pokryshkin, Bykov states no shared victories with the P-39 but only the three mentioned on the site claimed with MiG-3 and Yak-1.

Best wishes/Håkan

knusel 4th February 2019 19:06

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
Good evening Håkan,

I suppose the list I mentioned is based on Mr Bykov's work.
I would interpret it as listing 43+3sh kills of a total of 46+6sh.
Therefore, I think the dates and decimals of 3+3sh Pokryshkin kills are unknown to the webmaster (and Mr Bykov).
Could you agree ?

Michael

Håkan 6th February 2019 10:00

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
Hello Michael,

My interpretation is that when Pokryshkin was decorated with the third HSU in August 1944, the award documents mentions 46+6 but Bykov has only found evidence of 43+3 in his research.
The awards document are very often wrong (I've only looked into RAF and VVS so other air forces I don't know) so I would go for Bykov's 43+3 as the most correct.

Best wishes/Håkan

knusel 6th February 2019 12:37

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
Good morning Håkan,

would you say that wrong figures in the award documents are the main reason for the wrong totals of Soviet aces which can be read in older books ?

Have a nice Wednesday,

Michael

Håkan 7th February 2019 11:03

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
I think it's a combination of wrong info compiled in wartime, propaganda, a mix between claims, shared, probables etc. As I stated above, this is quit common in both RAF and VVS records.

//Håkan

knusel 8th February 2019 09:52

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
Good morning Håkan,

luckily, those 3+3sh claims that possibly miss would not change Pokryshkin's rank within the P-39 top ace list.

Have a nice weekend,

Michael

knusel 11th February 2020 11:33

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
Good morning Gentlemen,

I just finished reading "Reprise de la lutte sur P-39" by David Méchin. I did not know before that this excellent WW1 aviation expert has written WW2 articles, too. I learned that the French scored a few kills while protecting Mediterranean convois from bases in North Africa.

It seems to me like the P-39 scored on at least four continents:
  • Europe: Grigorii Rechkalov (Ukraine)
  • Africa: Hugh Dow (Tunisia)
  • Asia: ?
  • Australia & Oceania: William McDonough (Papua New Guinea)
  • America: Arthur Rice (Aleutians)
Can anybody tell me the name of a pilot who scored over the continent of Asia in a P-39 ?

Cheers,

Michael

Alfred.MONZAT 11th February 2020 16:50

Re: Bell P-39 top ten ace list
 
I am no aware of P-39 serving in the CBI but P-63 were used (and I believe scored) against the Japanese in August 1945.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net