![]() |
Re: Luftwaffe reports on downed Lavochkins
John
There was a question about difference between La-5FN and La-7 and I answered it as best as I could. This, together with details of Lend-Lease aircraft, is a widely available info, eg. in MBI monographs or Red Stars series. Igor There are reports noting either Me 109F or G, but otherwise your comment is spot on. |
Re: Luftwaffe reports on downed Lavochkins
Differences:
LaGG-3 (german identificate this as LaGG-3 or just LaGG) http://www.wunderwaffe.narod.ru/Maga...68/Draw/21.jpg La-5 - La-5F (german identificate La-5 as LaGG-5 or LaGG-9) http://www.wunderwaffe.narod.ru/Maga...69/Draw/03.jpg La-5F - La-5FN (german identificate this as La-5) http://www.wunderwaffe.narod.ru/Maga...69/Draw/07.jpg La-5FN - La-7 (german identificate this as La-5 or very rare as La-7) http://www.wunderwaffe.narod.ru/Maga...70/Draw/02.jpg As You can see, there is lack of visual differences between La5FN and La-7, and it was very easy to misidentificate. About colour marking of spinnercowl - AFAIK, there are following colours in Polk (equal german Gruppe) - as it was in 9 GvIAP: 1 Eskadrilya (Staffel) - red 2 Eskadrilya (Staffel) - blue 3 Eskadrilya (Staffel) - Yellow At least red cowl markings of La-7 were used in following regiments: 2 GvIAP,9 GvIAP, 32 GvIAP, 41 GvIAP, 63 GvIAP, 111 GvIAP, 176 GvIAP. A little OT: 2 Franek Grabowski: Quote:
According veterans memories, it was not serious problem to control manually all sistems in dogfight for them even when they were very young and unexpirienced pilots because it was so well trained IN EVERY pilot school, that in dogfight could swich all controls "automatically", without loosing concentration. MAY be You are thinking that La-5 & La-7 was a "bad" fighter... But german pilots, who was shot down by La's, disagree with You :) And dont forget that top scored Allied ace was pilot of La-5, La-5FN and La-7 - I.N.Kogedub. |
Re: Luftwaffe reports on downed Lavochkins
IIRC there were at least 40 changes between La-5FN and La-7. But i think it's right to say that in Germany this would be a letter behind the type designation.
Bad quality of parts shouldn't get to the assumption, the soviet planes hadn't good aerodynamics. In german reports about captived planes is stated, that british and soviet planes had in general worse quality in production, but this cannot be said about aerodynamic parts. Such differences were one of the reasons for the higher production figures of the allied industries. (Source: Budraß) |
Re: Luftwaffe reports on downed Lavochkins
2 Jens: are You talking about captured La-5F, wich was tested by Germans?
In russian forum there was a thread about THIS La-5F... It was very long serviced aircraft, with 2 !!! belly landings... And damaged engine... :) |
Re: Luftwaffe reports on downed Lavochkins
Quote:
2Gabor. Unfortenately I has not any details about the planes of 17 Air Army. |
Re: Luftwaffe reports on downed Lavochkins
Evgeniy
Quote:
Quote:
Otherwise, according to the veterans they often preliminary set everything before entering the combat just to avoid distraction. As I understand, average flight time of a Soviet pilot was in the area of 200-300 hrs before entering the combat. I am wondering, that if Westerners trained pilots for about 600 hrs, and then still introduced automatic devices, does it not mean they were worth of it? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Jens When the report had been filed? I believe all the Allied reports post-1943 underline the fact of decreasing quality of the German production. Nonetheless it must be noted aerodynamics is just only one factor. |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net