![]() |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
|
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Wow! Paper! You really are old! :D
|
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
I looked at the Microfiche and considered watching paint dry as a hobby instead of dealing with that, since it seemed more interesting than going through that!
If you delve into the early 1942 HW5 series you get paper copies of DEFE3... All the best Andreas |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
|
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
Actually 230+ and 150+ ! My secret desire is to do a 1st Century CE Roman Legionaire. Not sure I want to dig a trench/fort every night though! |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Just a short note. You can now download DEFE 3 for free, from NA website. Big files so you have to have a fairly quick connection:-)
Junker |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hi Junker,
how? Are there files for 1940? Regards Robert |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
hi,
maybe a stupid question, but what is DEFE 3? do you have a link to that file? i didn´t find it on the na-homepage... all the best jim |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
|
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Is it just me?
Where is the G.D.'d DOWNLOAD button or tab once you select the file you want?? Maybe you have to be a Brit to download? L. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hi Larry,
Go through the shopping motions and after about four steps you get a download link. bregds SES |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Thank you, SES.
Only government employees would think up ways to make things so user-unfriendly by failing to provide instructions that people just give up and say "the hell with it." What do I know. Maybe that was the purpose. L. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Well, that was a complete flop, SES. I jumped through all the hoops and nothing downloaded. I waited a full 5 minutes - nada, zilch, zip, zero, nothing. Screw it. Fortunately, I thoroughly researched all of the DEFE Hut 3 ULTRA on microfilm between 1988 and 1992, so nothing lost, nothing gained.
L. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hi Larry,
Maybe Jørn can provide some help. bregds SES |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Larry
When you click the download link, a new window should open in your browser. If you have pop-ups blocked, that may not work. You can not simultaneously download several files, and yes, it can take a long time for the download. These are large files, and the server is slow. I never had any trouble, so I am wondering if maybe your browser is blocking pop-ups? All the best Andreas |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
|
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
L. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
L. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
When I was researching at Freiburg I came to the conclusion that life would be perfect if Germany ran our public transport and Britain ran their archives. TNA have been refining and simplifying their services throughout the 25+ years I've been going there, so I doubt that the present downloading system will be their last word. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
All the best Andreas |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hello Nick,
Nick for president ! Enjoyed your striking observation about how the Germans handle their archives. I was quite surprised that the Bundesarchiv have succeeded to put some inventories online and anyone familiar with the old Findbücher will notice that it is more or less the same but then in a digital format... (sigh) I did the labourous job to download all DEFE 3 files but with a fast internet connection it was not a burden. In defence of the German archive authorities I must say that WW-2 is still a touchy subject so the WW-2 related archives are managed such that it rather discourages people than supporting historians with good intentions. Marcel / Venlo |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
L. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
TNA definitely is streets ahead of NARA though. All the best Andreas |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
|
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
I think the best I ever managed was 1,300 photos in a day, and with good planning going north of 1,000 is no problem. The problem is getting through the material once you are at home!
All the best Andreas |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
hi, by the way: are the defe3 files worth reading? i didn´t manage to download them, but a friend told me that there is only naval stuff in them, isn´t it? all the best jim |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
(b) No. If you look at the file descriptions the naval ones have contents with serial numbers starting ZTPG or similar. The ones with the Luftwaffe/Army signals start with two letters, e.g. VL, HP, BT and KO. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
Otherwise, my experience with them is restricted to Mediterranean Oct 41 - Feb 42. In this timeframe, I'd guesstimate probably more than half is navy, with another 40% air force, and the rest army. All the best Andreas |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
hi andreas and nick,
thanks for this info! too bad i still cannot download the files :-( all the best jim |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
|
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Quote:
All the best Andreas |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
hi,
i already switched the pop-up blocker off, but it doesn´t work. too bad. all the best jim |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hi everyone,
I am researching the role of ULTRA in shaping US policy with respect to the war in the Atlantic prior to 7 December 1941. My hypothesis is that Churchill provided information derived from ULTRA to the US administration in order to influence that policy. (One such case is well documented: the order from the Fuhrer to U-Boat commanders in June 1941 ordering them not to engage any US warships or any destroyers at all.) I have downloaded all of the relevant DEFE 3 files. A friend is gradually photographing the HW 1 files. I currently have copies of HW 1/1 through HW 1/41 with HW 1/42 through HW1/305 still waiting to be photographed. What I don't have now are any decrypts from the Luftwaffe, which brings me to HW 5. HW 5/1 through 5/8 cover the period prior to the introduction of the DEFE files and HW 5/9 through 5/42 covers the rest of the period of interest and overlaps with available DEFE 3 files. First question: does anyone already have electronic versions of any HW 1 files from HW 1/42 through HW 1/305 that they are willing to share/sell? Second question: does anyone have electronic versions of HW 5 up through HW 5/42 that they are willing to share/sell? Third question: have I missed someting in DEFE 3? For the period prior to December 1941, DEFE 3 only includes the ZTP/ZTPG, OL and MK series covering, none of which covers Luftwaffe operations in the Atlantic. Are there other series in DEFE 3 with records prior to December 1941? Fourth question: for those who have looked at both DEFE 3 and HW 5 files from February to December 1941, what will I miss if I only look at DEFE 3 files. I'm told that HW 5 adds more detail of an operational and logistical nature and that if information was of strategic or tactical importance, it would have been included in DEFE 3. Bottom line: do I need to get HW 5 files from February to Decemebr 1941 as well? Remember, I'm looking for information that if provided to the US might have shaped US policy in the Atlantic (e.g., British successes in the Battle of Britain, termination of Operation Sea Lion, etc.), not low-level operational or logistical details. Many thanks Marty Bollinger |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hi Marty,
You may already have covered this, but there are good insights into the transfer of information in 'BRITISH INTELLIGENCE IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR: Vol 1, ITS INFLUENCE ON STRATEGY AND OPERATIONS' by Hinsley. Pages 311-314 cover particular issues concerning the early exchange arrangements, and he quotes TNA sources. 'TRACKING THE AXIS ENEMY: THE TRIUMPH OF ANGLO-AMERICAN INAVAL INTELLIGENCE' by Bath is extensive in exploring the subject. Again, the sources are fully quoted. The variety of points that typically have to be brought together for research usually defy all attempts to narrow down the search area. I know it doesn't directly answer the series of questions you posted, but my gut feeling is that individual files hold the answers to questions so suggest that you may as well look forward to reading as much as possible of the HW and DEFE series! There will also political & diplomatic be information outside those series. Hope this helps, Bruce |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for in the Luftwaffe material - is it material with a bearing on naval operations? Naval Enigma hadn't been broken in 1940, had it?
1944-45 has been my main concern and the naval material in HW5 is very limited over that period. HW5 material about U-boats or coastal convoys often seems concerned with air attacks they have suffered or tactics to avoid such attacks, so I guess it is included for the RAF's benefit. I have also noticed that such items often carry both a "main series" serial number and a naval series one (suggesting to me that the original would be in the naval files). There is a file devoted to Sea Lion: HW 48/1 "Intelligence reports and correspondence concerning German preparations for the invasion of Britain." I haven't looked at it myself though. Bletchley Park referred to Seelöwe as "Operation Smith" incidentally. |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Thanks, Bruce and Nick,
I do have all of the Hinsley volumes, and that is where the reference to the order of June 1941 comes from. I also have just about every other book written on this subject, including Bath's. Most are focused on activities after the US joined the war. My focus is the aggressive actions taken by the US in the Atlantic before Pearl Harbor. My intent is to go back to primary sources and to try to correlate (1) the existence of UK decrypts of potential usefulness in persuading FDR to take more aggressive action, (2) a mechanism of transfer of that information to FDR (e.g., meetings with Churchhill, Halifax, Godfrey, Winant, Donovan, etc. and (3) consequent actions by the US that appear to have leveraged that intelligence. The "smoking gun" would be existence of information highly linked to Ultra decrypts in contemporary US intelligence records, though some of those records have never been declassified. (I am exploring ways to access those archives and may be able to do so.) I am comfortable that DEFE 3 will give me the relevant naval enigma decrypts from the point at which they started in February 1941. The Luftwafe decrypts started in 1940 and it is that information I now seek. I don't think it is in DEFE 3 but instead in HW 5. So I will have to get access to the HW 5 records. I am particularly keen to find the decrypts of 16 July 1940 since Stevenson has written (in a book criticized by many others for inaccuracies) that the King showed Donovan a decrypt from that day when he met with Donovan on 17 July 1940. Thanks for the heads up on HW 48/1. I had not thought of looking there. Will do so. Marty |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Me again. My strong impression, after viewing many files and drinking many cups of tea staring into the distance, is that the only way to see what influenced US decision making processes during that period is to start with the US facility for tracking U-boats (pre OP20-G). Although not as sophisticated as the UK Submarine Tracking Room, it was the only place the US authorities had where the whole story was available to view. It incorporated current and hstorical information into the assesments produced and, as such, became an intelligence source in it's own right. This is would have been the paramount source for policy-makers to study trends.
A single conversation with an OP20-G member a few years ago settled it in my mind. He was surprised that I would even ask: as far as he was concerned, the natural suspicion of code-breaking and SIGINT in general by many senior staff was overcome by the 'matter-of-fact' reports coming out of this source, and the doubters seemed able to ignore the SIGINT background. As you no doubt appreciate, FDR had been moving mountains behind the scenes to prepare the USA for war, and he found a great partner in Churchill, but the British transfer of scientific equipment and intelligence information during 1940 began before Winston took control. Bruce |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Thanks, Bruce.
Not sure I agree with your view that UK-US SIGINT cooperation predated Churchill. The transfer of SIGINT methods almost certainly began with the meeting on 8 Jul 1940 between Lord Lothian and FDR. While we don't know what was discussed on this specific topic in this meeting, we now know (as of recent 2010 NSA document releases) that FDR, Stimson and Knox approved the sharing of cryptological methods on 11 July 1940 and that Donovan took off for London three days later. This is prior to the Standardization of Arms Commitee meetings which I believe (without proof yet) were in part cover for the cryptological cooperation. I've never encountered any data that suggest there was cryptological cooperation prior to that point. If you have some, I'm keen to learn more. As for OP-20-G, they dragged their feet compared to the US Army. On 5 September 1940 Gen. Strong asked Gen. Marshall to include Army cryptological methods in the technical exchanges under the Standardization of Army Committee. Marshall agreed but could not get the Navy to participate. There are indications that OP-20-G was permitted to request SIGINT information from GC&CS beginning in late September but it is unclear when the first transfers took place. There are rumors of submarine tracking charts in OP-20-G that have annotations linked to ULTRA and I intend to pursue that line of research. My sneaky suspicion is that the UK agreed to share submarine SIGINT-based information with the US (without indicated whether it came from basic Y-Service tracking or decrypted messages) in return for the US policies to openly broadcast the positions of any submarines sighted in the Atlantic. This would have provided cover in 1941 for any sudden success of Royal Navy escorts in tracking and destroying submarines, diverting suspicion from the fact that the Brits had broken the Enigma / Dolphin code. Marty |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hi Marty,
I will answer in more detail when I can access my library, but briefly ... 'The transfer of SIGINT methods almost certainly began with the meeting on 8 Jul 1940 between Lord Lothian and FDR.' ... is not the way I read the situation. The exchange of information and some technology was already established, on a less ambitious scale, since 1937 or 1938. The full scale pooling of resouces in the summer of 1940 was built on the succesful groundwork laid over the previous two years. Will follow up soon. Bruce |
Re: Using Ultra to research the Luftwaffe
Hello Bruce,
I have reviewed my sources and re-read Bath. Of of this affirms my earlier conclusion that discussion of SIGINT / cryptological technologies and methods began only in August of 1940. There was very modest cooperation in the area of SIGINT / traffic anaylsis but that, too, didn't become significant until mid 1940. Marty |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2026, 12oclockhigh.net