Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem?? (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=37717)

sidney 8th May 2014 01:24

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Post No.30, Item No.2: The following information was provided by Ralph Zimmer from the literature quoted in the assessment, as follows: "According to JFV vol 6-1, p. 158, Stab/JG27 had Bf109F-2 in addition to Bf109Es from June 1941 onwards. From the end of August or the beginning of September the Stab had Bf109F-4 too (JFV 9-1, p. 361). In the Prien/Rodeike/Stemmer chronicle on Stab and I./JG27 and in JFV vol.6-1 there are losses of Bf109Fs documented on 18.June 1941 (Bf109F-2 WNr. 8198) and 13. September 1941 (Bf109F-2, WNr.9694). So Maj. Woldenga would not need to bring an own Bf109F nor to use special relations to aquire one - Stab/JG27 already had some on strength."

ouidjat 8th May 2014 09:31

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasmussen (Post 184060)
For your JG 27 - argumentation you need:

1.) not an Grodino but an Maslovo in the JG 27 area
2.) an proof that Stab/ JG 27 got Bf 109F- 4 before in Döberitz were given Bf 109F-4trop.

I know Rasmussen,

It's not complete, but coherent :)

For 2. I think it's done.
For 1. As I wrote before; I read Baslovo and I'm afraid there is as much Baslovo than Maslovo :)

Regards, Franck.

Rasmussen 8th May 2014 09:48

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ouidjat (Post 184068)
For 1. As I wrote before; I read Baslovo and I'm afraid there is as much Baslovo than Maslovo.

It's your choice. For me (personal) it seems you have an strange understandig of Roman letters and their spelling ... you live to long in China ;)

ouidjat 8th May 2014 10:24

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Ah ah ah Maybe !!! :)

https://www.google.fr/search?q=sutte...w=1366&bih=562

Here is a choice for Sutterlin links ... I'm not able to find an M like the one written on photo's back but a B yes.

What I found:

Baslovo Pskov
Baslovo Vtoroye
Baslovo Pervoye
Novoye Baslovo
Baslovo, Novgorodskaya Oblast

1 and 2 seem to me the same ... Last one sounds good ..

RolandF 8th May 2014 10:38

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
You always have to take into consideration that the originals are written in kyrillic letters and this is a german transscription - which is rather different to the international transscription. There are two different letters "B" in kyrillic - one looking like quite similar to a "B" and pronounced like a "b" and an other one looking exactly like a latin "B" but pronounced as "v". (German "w" - which would be closer to an "M"). What if the hamlet is too small to be part of a map and you have to rely on the pronounciation of the local populace. Many members of the Luftwaffe still used written "Sütterlin", some already writing "Normschrift", some using a mixture of both. Typewriters used "Normschrift", printed media used mainly still "Schwabacher" etc. etc.... So "Baslowo", "Maslovo" or even "Waslowo" may be possible imo.

Regards

Roland

P.S. The writer of the caption uses a rather clean "Sütterlin". The first letter is NO Sütterlin "M" and the 6th letter NO Sütterlin "v"....

Rasmussen 8th May 2014 17:53

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
The writer of the caption doesn't used an clean "Sütterlin" --- please --- have a look on the "e" in "ein" or "notgelandeter" or the "s" in "deutscher". The "d" is an letter written in Sütterlin not more. He wrote in principle in a "fast handwriting" in Normschrift ... so - of course the "M" isn't written in Sütterlin. It's an fast written M in Normschrift. I write "my" M in my signature on the same kind.

Regards Rasmussen

RolandF 8th May 2014 19:32

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Yes, I noticed this, Rasmussen. He uses some kind of mixture, this makes it difficult. Obviously a young person having been trained in Sütterlin at school and updating his handwriting with the new letters. But look how he writes his "d", "n" and "a"(oben offen). What I wanted to say - there are much more possibilities to read this caption ;-)

Servus

Roland

ouidjat 9th May 2014 14:47

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Well, what we do now nice fellows? ... :)

Andreas Brekken 9th May 2014 16:17

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sidney (Post 184061)
Post No.30, Item No.2: The following information was provided by Ralph Zimmer from the literature quoted in the assessment, as follows: "According to JFV vol 6-1, p. 158, Stab/JG27 had Bf109F-2 in addition to Bf109Es from June 1941 onwards. From the end of August or the beginning of September the Stab had Bf109F-4 too (JFV 9-1, p. 361). In the Prien/Rodeike/Stemmer chronicle on Stab and I./JG27 and in JFV vol.6-1 there are losses of Bf109Fs documented on 18.June 1941 (Bf109F-2 WNr. 8198) and 13. September 1941 (Bf109F-2, WNr.9694). So Maj. Woldenga would not need to bring an own Bf109F nor to use special relations to aquire one - Stab/JG27 already had some on strength."

No - they did not have Bf 109F-4s at strength - at best they had some on loan from another unit.

I respect the work that Dr. Prien has done immensely - the books are tremendous resources - but one should never use books as proof as you do now - simply because they can contain errors and typos. Jochen Prien is the first to acknowledge that when you have a source material as large as his - and as prone for errors as the sources itself can be (in my work with my loss database I have entered over 14700 corrections to the loss records - and that is without the entire 1944 and large portions of 1945 where the records are not to be found and have probably been destroyed) any publication however well researched and proofread can contain errors.

First - your reference to the loss of WNr 8198 - this aircraft is listed as being lost 60% by Stab/JG 27 on June 18th 1941 - but it is also noted as lost 100% on June 25th 1941 with II./JG 52 - one of these must be erronous. II./JG 52 had Bf 109F's on strength according to their strength returns at that time - Stab/JG 27 did not - I know which loss I have marked as dubious with regards to validity.

Second - your reference to the loss of WNr 9694 - this aircraft is reported as damaged 10% by Stab/JG 27 on September 13th 1941, but also listed as lost as an E-7 by 5./JG 52 on September 27th 1941.

So your evidence is not as rock solid as you might believe - and as all of these losses are Sachschaden only - no personnel injured or otherwise harmed - one can not use NVMs to try to conclude with regards to which record is correct and which one is wrong.

Just to be sure that our team has not made an error when entering these in the database I just checked the records - all the WNr are clearly correctly entered - and we thus have real duplicate loss records from two different units for these WNr with just a few days apart.

I agree with ouidjat on this one - until further proof - preferably from primary sources - there is no proof yet that Stab/JG 27 had Bf 109Fs on strength prior to their conversion at Döberitz.

Regards,
Andreas B

Andreas Brekken 9th May 2014 16:19

Re: eBay: a Stab JG27 Bf109.. with Stab emblem??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ouidjat (Post 184053)
Google street ... I don't believe it!!! :)

Can't someone call that guy and ask if he can take a photo from inside his yard???

Regards,
Andreas B


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:47.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net