![]() |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Well one learns something new every week at least, the Pluswood sheets would have had to be shipped across on transports then, or had they a plant in the UK. One of the things I suppose we always say is that the wooden sconstruction cut down on the use of imported aluminium, but if the Pluswood was being shipped across the Atlantic anyway....
Here is a little Popular Mechanics article about it, hope the link works: http://books.google.com/books?id=Ftc...squito&f=false Interesting, thanks for the input. Dennis |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Dennis,
Thanks. It could not be a coincidence that the clipping indicated by you is of September 1943 and in November 1943 the American aviation press informed that the Pluswood delivers its materials for the British Mosquitos. |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
By September 1943 the Mosquito was in full production at de Havilland Canada in Downsview (now part of Toronto). I wonder if this is where the US plywood was going?
|
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Quote:
Can you recommend any other reference articles / books? I'd be especially interested in the P-39 comparison, and in any info you might know of re: Soviet use of wood materials in aircraft construction. Thanks again. |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Quote:
Link works fine. I can remember my old Granddad, who'd been in the Merchant Marine in the Great War, commenting on how crew morale was often dependent on the cargo carried, wood being top of the list... |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Quote:
Quote:
The same "Aeroplane" issue, as above mentioned, informed as follows: "Mark I Mosquitoes built in Canada are already in service with the USAAF and RCAF on the American continent. Like those which have now been delivered to Great Britain , they are entirely Canadian-built except for certain fittings like hydraulic jacks which were sent over from this side of the Atlantic." |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Quote:
When it comes to the Soviets I would recommend wartime issues of the German "Luftwissen" magazines. The British "Aeroplane" magazine, Vol. LXV No. 1682, August 20th 1943, published (page 202) small but very interesting article based on the "Luftwissen" mentioned, where the Germans analysed the airframes of captured Yak-1, LaGG-3 and MiG-3. The British titled their article "Russian Aircraft Timbers". |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Many thanks for that.
|
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
Quote:
Thanks. The construction of the Mosquito is still high tech even by today's standards. I found a 2007 paper in Portuguese describing its construction in arguement for using Portuguese cork in the construction of modern (civil) aircraft. I have great difficulty at work getting past the perception that wooden constructions are "old fashioned", when they are sometimes the best material for the task. I cannot tell you the number of cameras I have stabilized with wood to damp out unwanted vibrations. The nearest man-made composite is linen based phenolic. |
Re: All metal Mosquito ??
http://web.me.com/lllanducci/EAA-138...ber%202009.pdf
Here is an interesting reference to Pluswood by the son/grandson of the company owners in which he states that: "At the start of WWII, the Government hired our Company, along with the others mentioned in the previous articles, to manufacture plywood for the British " Mosquito " bomber. Our Company shipped over 1000 train car loads of special, high strength plywood to England." Here is another article from the same source: http://web.me.com/lllanducci/EAA-138...uly%202009.pdf States that Pluswood provided 35% of the plywood for the British built Mosquito and Roddis provided the rest. It also states that Roddis provided the plywood for the Canadian build. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net