Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Allied and Soviet Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ... (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=12858)

Juha 2nd May 2008 17:34

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Igor
6.3. the lead navigator of second bomber division made navigational error and was IIRC some 15 miles off course when German fighters attacked it head on. Because effects of head on attack was well known, escort was best around and forward of the lead bomber division but the navigation error opened to Germans opportunity to attack a weakly protected second division head on. So many of the bomber losses resulted from that.

Over Berlin IIRC clouds made it impossible to identify main targets.

Juha

Kutscha 2nd May 2008 18:20

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Evgeny Velichko (Post 65180)
Kutscha:

A little off-topic question:

Do You have the same list for 22.02.44?

Evgeny, look here: http://paul.rutgers.edu/~mcgrew/wwii/usaf/html/

Kutscha 2nd May 2008 18:33

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
TUESDAY, 22 FEBRUARY 1944

EUROPEAN THEATER OF OPERATIONS (ETO)

STRATEGIC OPERATIONS (Eighth Air Force): HQ VIII Bomber Command is
redesignated as HQ, Eighth Air Force.

Mission 230: "Big Week" continues with 799 aircraft dispatched against German aviation and Luftwaffe airfields; 41 bombers and 11 fighters are lost.

1. 289 B-17s are dispatched against aviation industry targets at Aschersleben (34 bomb), Bernburg (47 bomb) and Halberstadt (18 bomb) in conjunction with a Fifteenth Air Force raid on Regensburg, Germany; 32 hit Bunde, 19 hit Wernegerode, 15 hit Magdeburg, 9 hit Marburg and 7 hit other targets of opportunity; they claim 32-18-17 Luftwaffe aircraft; 38 B-17s are lost, 4 damaged beyond repair and 141 damaged; casualties are 35 KIA, 30 WIA and 367 MIA.

2. 333 B-17s are dispatched to Schweinfurt but severe weather prevents aircraft from forming properly and they are forced to abandon the mission prior to crossing the enemy coast; 2 B-17s are damaged.

3. 177 B-24s are dispatched but they are recalled when 100 miles (160 km) inland; since they were over Germany, they sought targets of opportunity but strong winds drove the bombers over The Netherlands and their bombs hit Enschede, Arnhem, Nijmegen and Deventer; they claim 2-0-0 Luftwaffe aircraft; 3 B-24s are lost and 3 damaged; casualties are 30 MIA.

These missions are escorted by 67 P-38s, 535 Eighth and Ninth Air Force P-47s, and 57 Eighth and Ninth Air Force P-51s; the P-38s claim 1-0-0 Luftwaffe aircraft, 1 P-38 is damaged beyond repair and 6 are damaged; the P-47s claim 39-6-15 Luftwaffe aircraft, 8 P-47s are lost and 12 damaged, 8 pilots are MIA; the P-51s claim 19-1-10 Luftwaffe aircraft, 3 P-51s are lost and 3 damaged, 3 pilot are MIA.


kalender, you expect instant success? There is bound to be ups and downs. Stop the nitpicking.

Evgeny Velichko 2nd May 2008 18:52

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Thank You VERY much Kutcha!

Sorry for Offtop:

Quote:

289 B-17s claim 32-18-17 Luftwaffe aircraft
177 B-24s claim 2-0-0 Luftwaffe aircraft

67 P-38s claim 1-0-0 Luftwaffe aircraft
535 P-47s claim 39-6-15 Luftwaffe aircraft
57 P-51s claim 19-1-10 Luftwaffe aircraft
32-18-17 - what does that mean? Killed-Damaged-probably killed?

Is there any way to find out types of aircraft claimed? How many Bf109's, Fw190's, Bf110's and Me410's claimed by USAAF pilots and gunners?

Kutscha 2nd May 2008 19:04

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Yes Evgeny that is what the numbers mean.

One would have look at the combat reports to find out what a/c. Maybe Bill (drgondog) can help you.

drgondog 2nd May 2008 19:22

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kutscha (Post 65208)
Yes Evgeny that is what the numbers mean.

One would have look at the combat reports to find out what a/c. Maybe Bill (drgondog) can help you.

Kutscha correct but other different sources are pretty good for actual Awards - but first the 'order'. The Encounter Reports will state the claims which are frequently reduced from Destroyed to Probable or Damaged depending on review of combat film, etc.

The bomber claims were always greatly overstated. The fighter claims were much better matched

I also found that in many cases an award (i.e. "I hit him hard, coolant streaming and he crash landed in a field" would be a 'kill' but if it was say "55%" damaged and repairable, it would not go on the books as destroyed - even if the pilot died of wounds)

The 'Order'

Destroyed-Probable-Damaged for air awards and Destroyed-Damaged for ground awards.

The best sources for actual types are either the USAAF 8th AF Victory Credits Board or Frank Olynyk's lists. A good source is Kent Miller's Fighter Units and Pilots of the 8th AF, published by Schiffer.

I have spent a lot of time researching all the above plus the USAF 85 study which thoroughly reviewed 8th AF (and all AF) for 'double entries, awards made w/o film or witness confirmation, etc and reduced the scores accordingly. Frank Olynyk on the other hand picked up many claims that were never processed (like some POW returnees) and researched them to validate and add to his lists.

I continue to review between Dr Olynyk and USAF 85 for my own lists and use Miller to help cross check actual 'type' a/c for 8th AF (only)

drgondog 2nd May 2008 20:03

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kalender1973 (Post 65155)
Hi Bill,

thanks for the link. It is very intresting statistic. But with this statistic we risk the loss focus of the discussion: if the few Mustangs was key factor for the success of 8th air force.

First of all I suggest to narrow the time slice that we take in account. Our discussion focus on the first half 1944 until the landing in Normandy. As I already wrote, it was a turning point in air war. It were two different Luftwaffe, in spring and late autumn 1944. The german pilots reach there units only with 10-20 flying hours in their Bf109 or FW190. It is clear that the succeses of US fighter dramatically increased and in that time the P-51 was key US figther. And if you write about german losses on the ground, we must recall that most of them was suffered at two last week of the war, where the german put open there planes on their fields.

Igor - You are correct for many of the US Fighter Groups such as 356th and 78th and 353rd - late converters from the P-47 to the P-51 plus the 56th (all P-47), but not the 4th and 355th and 352nd etc which started destruction of German aircraft in remote reaches of Germany in March 1944 and continued through rest of war.

Further, while a lot of the a/c that were concentrated (with little fuel) on airfields in April 1945, they were there because the perimeter was shrinking and they had no fuel and few pilots making them essentially non-critical.

But if we look at the spring of 1944 the picture is something different. You write that P-47 reach only Dummer lake. But in my eyes it was enough. Due the decision of perephery defence the most german figther units were deployed even in the north and north-west Germany and Netherland: JG1, 11, I,II/JG3...

The German controllers were very clever and while P-47s (and Spitfires) engaged the JG2 and JG26 over the Occupied countries during Penetration and Withdrawal Support, the bulk of the air defense was calculated to engage beyond the range of Escorts.

March 6 was a good example. The LuftFlotte Reich defense engaged prematurely at Dummer Lake and was hurt by the 56th FG but the Mustangs were engaging from that point all the way to Berlin. From that day, there was no place that the LW controllers could have confidence that they could assemble the ZG Gruppen without suffering heavy losses - for any targets at Bremen-Stuttgart line and beyond.

The Mustangs completely changed the air superiority situation over central Germany to Poland - opening up all the Synthetic Fuel/Oil and Chemical plants to attack.

And after the fight with the P-47, the germans with their short range planes must be refuelled and come rare to second concentrate attack. Therefore a few P-51 of direct escort was enough. But it is not fair to minimize role of other 8th air force fighters.

I am not minimizing contribution of P-47 or P-38 but there is a fundamental reason that the P-51 replaced both in the ETO. Better air superiority fighter and the bombers were 'bait' to draw the Luftwaffe into fighting. The 8th AF FC mission was to kill the Luftwaffe in the air and on the ground and they performed very well in those 5 months precceding Overlord. The Mustang was the most important Allied fighter in killing the experienced fighter pilots during January to June deep over Germany.

If you look at 6th march, than you must agree that it was not the best mission of USAAF. From 730 bomber was lost 69. And the main targed was not attacked. From 100 P-51 was lost 5 (5%) and from 615 P-47 was lost also 5 (0,8%). The P-51 claims only 43:36=1,2 more german planes as P-47. The numbers are not really fantastic.
And I would like to see the plane types of the P-51 claims, IIRC many of the were two engines from NJG's.

I will dig into it but IIRC the distribution was about 65% s/e and 35% t/e. Many of the Me 110 and 210's fell to the 4th and 357th past the Dummer Lake area (where they were assembled out of range from the P-47). So a high percentage of the Mustang scores on 6 March WAS t/e. This was the beginning of the end for NJG resistance for daylight attacks and severly hurt NJG effectiveness against night RAF attacks

Best regards

The LW pilots were still receiving 'adequate' training in the first 5 months, but could not keep pace with the attrition inflicted by the Mustangs.

The Oil campaign starting on May12 was the beginning of the dramatic reduction in new pilot training and significant movement of KG and SG pilots to backfill the losses of Feb-May, 1944.

The 25-50 hour pilots were showing up in September and peaked in November when they simply should not have been in the sky. JG301 in late November was a classic example of the low time pilot in Fw 190A8's

I had a detailed conversation with Galland in 1983 before publishing my book and he permitted me to reprint a letter about the impact of the Mustang on LW Operations. Essentially the Mustang interdicted formation assembly, killed many German pilots taking off and landing, shot up airfields and reduced 'effectives' at strategic points (munich/Berlin for example) for days - shot up rail and barge traffic when Speer decentralized plants and needed to move subassemblies from one factory to another.. and put up a fighter with equal performance (or greater at bomber altitudes) over HIS cities...

If the LW have Mustangs during BoB, we might be speaking German.

Just a few of his observations about the Strategic footprint of the Mustang.

Regards,

Bill

Franek Grabowski 2nd May 2008 23:22

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Well, I would say there is no single breaking point that turned the course of war. The Big Week was not a breaking point itself, it was just a step in the right direction. Another one was airwar for supremacy over Normandy, which resulted in virtual annihilation of several Luftwaffe units to the degree they were unable to recuperate. Still, Luftwaffe existed, but it was existence to cease. Mustang was just only a factor, but a major factor because it was the aircraft able to reach almost every German target and still be competitive with any aircraft Germans could have produced. This was a key factor for the Big Week but also for Normandy.
I must disagree with some comments concerning Luftwaffe though. Most of the problems were based on inadequate training of the personnel, and resulting inability to fight against large formations of aircraft. Also a very poor navigation training, which resulted with many units being unable to arrive to Normandy within expected time. It is noticeable that there were several airmen arriving to units in Normandy, who were trained for about two years but still not capable of flying combat missions. In my opinion, part of the credit for victory should go to the Luftwaffe itself.
And just a few words about this old Soviet myth of second front. It did exist well before Soviets switched sides in Balkans or in Africa. It continued to exist with the invasion of Italy in 1943. It was over Germany, in Burma, New Guinea and Pacific. It was in occupied Europe. This was a World War not without reason.

Evgeny Velichko 2nd May 2008 23:29

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Franek - pls, not blame on "Soviets". I live in EX-USSR, and my 2 grandfathers were "SOVITES". And they fought hardly in WW II not to became SLAVES OF "HIGHER RACE".

Pls leave "Soviets" to history.

Franek Grabowski 3rd May 2008 00:39

Re: Cobras, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Eastern vs Western front, Franek vs ...
 
Evgenij
Soviet Union attacked my country together with this Higher Race and inflicted similar losses in comparable period of occupation. It enslaved us and several countries of the region. I do remember Soviet occupation forces and I do remember how hard it was to rid them off, and what was left behind.
I understand that the people of Soviet Union had very little choice in regard of their nationality, and that they could have had no choice during the war (still a significant number of ex-Soviet soldiers joined Polish forces during the Polish Campaign). But this should not be used to justify criminal nature of Soviet Union and communism.
Have in mind that among others we discuss aircraft like Thunderbolt and Yakovlev, both created by designers of similar origin. The question arises, why Kartvelli and Seversky could not remain in Russia and to design Thunderbolt there.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:46.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net