![]() |
Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
Hi,
Can anyone help me please? Excluding Soviet aircraft, did the Allied aircraft ever "sport" winter camouflage? Thanks Pt. |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
I seem to recall photos of US aircraft in temporary winter schemes for exercises just before Pearl Harbor.
|
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
There was a specific camouflage drawn up for Hurricane operations in Norway, with the light Sky Grey colour underneath and taken up the fuselage sides, but it was not used on the aircraft that actually went.
Other than that, and it's marginal enough, I can't think of any. |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
Hi
only thing that springs to mind are the meteors, in holland. cheers Jerry |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
Quote:
Many Norwegian Air Force aircraft were painted in winter camouflage in April/May 1940 though, if these count as Allied aircraft. Nils |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
Apparently the Meteors in Holland were painted white for ID and not for winter camo. As genuine winter camo I can only think of the Norwegian planes in 1940 and possibly Finnish aircraft in late 1944 early 45, though I can't say if I have any proof of winter camo in that time frame.
|
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
I have also seen it argued that one of the 263 Sq aircraft was a borrowed Sea Gladiator, which would also have this high demarcation and Sky Grey undersides.
But not as a winter scheme, no. Painting the Meteors white overall suggests that this was indeed for ID purposes, as otherwise only the uppersurfaces need be painted. Not Allied, but possibly outside the the original poster's thought, the Japanese did use a light camouflage for aircraft on the northern islands. I don't believe that the Americans did in the Aleutians. |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
263 Squadron did receive a Sea Gladiator because the squadron lost one of its own Gladiators on the carrier.
This is the photo that has been used as "proof" of the Arctic scheeme being applied to the Gladiators: http://home.online.no/%7Evingtor/Pho...askogsvann.jpg I have however seen a much better copy of this photo, not a copy of a copy of a copy like the one above but one made directly from the original negative. This reveals the camouflage pattern on the fuselage sides that correspond with the standard camouflage scheme for RAF biplane fighters as described in Air Diagram 1162. Myth busted! Nils |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
A Winter camo, what for?
Apart for a very short time in Norway, no Allied aircraft fought in the snow. Even the US 11th AF in the Aleoutians thought they could do without it, persistent fog being a much better camouflage than a coat of white paint. |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
Winter 1939/40 in Northern France,and the same area in 1944/45, when the British and US Armies adopted limited white camouflage. Winter in Northern Italy. Operations over Norway, and parts of the British Isles any normal winter. The Aleutians. The RAF at Murmansk, and operating from Iceland.
There are enough possible examples to make it a sensible question, though the answer is no. |
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
Many thanks for the responses and help! :)
|
Re: Allied Aircraft Winter Camouflage
Quote:
Seems to a mix of opinions on the net, some websites mention they were for camo, some for recognition. cheers Jerry http://www.faqs.org/docs/air/avmeteor.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor ducimus C&M states, .... it has been said that the white finish was for identification purposes.... .... but a further possibility is that it was for ground camouflage during the heavy snow falls .... |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net