Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Off Topic (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   BIN LADEN (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=25283)

Brian 4th May 2011 11:45

BIN LADEN
 
Hi guys

OK, completely 'off topic' but I would be interested in what others think and have to say on the subject of Bin Laden's death.

Obviously a man with very evil intentions (in the eyes of the West) and IMHO the world is a better place without him and his ilk.

However, admitted assassination of any person must have legal repercussions, hasn't it? Is it not a crime in international law? And now with the admission that Bin Laden was unarmed when shot dead, surely that constitutes a war crime?

Over to others for their opinions.

Brian

Pilot 4th May 2011 12:08

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Hard to believe that fact will come to light. For many he is just CIA agent who did good job in Afgan war against Soviets. He have too much money and influence to be shoot just like that. Image shown in public is just fake. Most stupid is the pubic note that he was drop in sea during burial ceremony as the tradition demand this. Tradition demand to be buried in soil warped in white fabric. But if he is in sea, nobody will be able to proof is he really or not. I know that officials declared that DNK analyze proof his identity but we have also expert who give 'proof analyze' of the dead people in village Racak, which caused attack on my country (so no way to trust in similar info again).

This is just intro in something but it is hardly to guess what...

Brian Bines 4th May 2011 13:36

Re: BIN LADEN
 
It would seem more logical to fake his death, then whisk him away to a quiet spot so any information, that might prevent future attacks, could be extracted. Killing him suggests he either had no extra information or what he had is not judged to be in the public interest. Taking him prisoner in public brings a whole range of problems, I expect this like the killing of JFK will long be discussed.

Nick Beale 5th May 2011 09:59

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Bines (Post 127147)
he either had no extra information or what he had is not judged to be in the public interest.

Who needs the man when you have his phones, laptops and memory sticks?

Pilot 5th May 2011 11:30

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Quote:

Who needs the man when you have his phones, laptops and memory sticks?
Correct!!!

David Ransome 5th May 2011 22:36

Re: BIN LADEN
 
There has been no admitted assassination, as in a deliberate preplanned killing. Knowledge of suicide bomber techniques meant that if he was clothed, possibly concealing a bomb, he was more likely to be shot and instantly 'disabled'. Any body, particularly arm, movements would increase the possibility of that shooting.

Nick Beale 7th May 2011 10:43

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by David Ransome (Post 127274)
Any body, particularly arm, movements would increase the possibility of that shooting.

Britain set a precedent with the Gibraltar killings: the IRA suspects raised their hands in the air when challenged. The SAS apparently interpreted this as a prelude to setting off a remote-controlled bomb and shot them anyway.

I'm not sure just how one might surrender to special forces — I rather suspect you can't.

JohnnyB 6th July 2011 00:03

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Hi Brian,

just a counter-question :

how many unarmed people were killed in the name of Bin Laden without being involved in a war ?

My opinion is :
Bin Laden did not deserve a public forum like a court to defend his islamo-terroristic ideologies and actions - he would have turned this court into his personal Mecca. No doubt - he wanted a war against the western world, so he got a war and he died in his war.

Regards - Rainer

Oberst 22nd July 2011 22:29

Re: BIN LADEN
 
The bottom line: The Arabs are not happy!
They're not happy in Gaza.
They're not happy in Egypt.
They're not happy in Libya.
They're not happy in Morocco...
They're not happy in Iran.
They're not happy in Iraq.
They're not happy in Yemen.
They're not happy in Afghanistan.
They're not happy in Pakistan.
They're not happy in Syria.
They're not happy in Lebanon...
And where arethey happy?
They're happy in England...
They're happy in France.
They're happy in Italy.
They're happy in Germany...
They're happy in Sweden.
They're happy in the USA.
They're happy in Norway.
They’re happy in Canada
They’re happy in Australia
They're happy in every country that is not
Muslim.
And whom do they blame?
Not Islam.
Not their leadership.
Not themselves
.
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN.

JohnnyB 22nd July 2011 23:23

Re: BIN LADEN
 
It is not ok to all be lumped together, Oberst...

Oberst 22nd July 2011 23:33

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Nor was it ok to lump together innocent people during the 9/11/2011 attacks..

JohnnyB 22nd July 2011 23:50

Re: BIN LADEN
 
What I´ve wrote in post #8 ? Success.

Oberst 22nd July 2011 23:57

Re: BIN LADEN
 
yes! success! we'll see who was resposible for the bombing in Oslo, Norway today.

General Savage 23rd July 2011 00:02

Re: BIN LADEN
 
They went in, shot the bastard and then took his body with them to dump at sea so there wouldn't be any holy shrines.
Hurrah for our guys. Good one Navy Seals.
The fact that he was living a normal life in a luxury dwelling in Islamabad in a country propped up with US dollars will be of ongoing interest.

JohnnyB 23rd July 2011 20:33

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberst (Post 131631)
yes! success! we'll see who was resposible for the bombing in Oslo, Norway today.


Hi Oberst - Oslo, the news in the moment from the geman press :

"The police had arrested the alleged perpetrators Anders Breivik Behring on the island. Breivik, 32, has apparently a fundamentalist Christian point of view, said a police spokesman."

Finacial Times Germany :
"According to police, Behrings´s actions have a racist and anti-Islamic background."

JohnnyB 25th July 2011 15:27

Re: BIN LADEN
 
"we'll see who was resposible for the bombing in Oslo"

A mentally deranged christian fundamentalist with best connections to the right scene kills icecold more than 90 people - nine years he has planned his crime disguised as a perfectly ordinary bio-farmer.

Anders Breivik : "The killings are gruesome, but needful"

No further comment

Maxim1 7th August 2011 20:33

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Savage (Post 131632)
The fact that he was living a normal life in a luxury dwelling in Islamabad in a country propped up with US dollars will be of ongoing interest.

Oh, who needs 'an ongoing interest'? The right decision is to bomb this country immediately, just like in the case of Serbia, Iraq, Afganistan.

Nick Beale 8th August 2011 01:51

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxim1 (Post 132441)
Oh, who needs 'an ongoing interest'? The right decision is to bomb this country immediately, just like in the case of Serbia, Iraq, Afganistan.

I hope that this was intended ironically. If not, I'm sure there are better places than TOCH to debate foreign policy. And anyway, a little more attention to the subject of this forum — aviation history — will offer a more balanced appreciation of the limitations of aerial bombardment in securing states' policy objectives.

Pilot 8th August 2011 09:22

Re: BIN LADEN
 
Quote:

to bomb this country immediately, just like in the case of Serbia, Iraq, Afganistan
Not my intention to learn somebody job but this is propaganda of violence...


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net