Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Two Stammkennzeichen (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=45230)

Nick Beale 7th June 2016 22:36

Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Does anyone know anything about:
  1. Aircraft NQ+VR (e.g. type and Werk Nummer; or
  2. He 111 SQ+MX (sub-type and Werk Nummer)?
Thanks.

RT 7th June 2016 22:46

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
SQ+MX He111H-16 161260

NO+V Bf109G-6
ND+V Ju88A-5
NQ+U Ju88C-6/Ju-w34

Nothing for the NQ+V

Rémi

Nick Beale 7th June 2016 23:25

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Thanks Rémi,

NQ+AU was a signals aircraft destroyed at Trondheim on 26 or 28 April 1940
NQ+AY was Ju 52, W.Nr. 58634 associated with KGr. 100 in 1940

Tom Willis 8th June 2016 02:01

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Hi - I have NQ+VA as a Ju 52/3m - W/Nr 5480. 10./Ln.Rgt.40 dated 29.09.42
The only source I have for this is the Stkz lists from Peter van Gogh

Regards Tom

Nick Beale 8th June 2016 08:25

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
I also have Ju 87 D-5, W.Nr. 142083, NQ+TC (V8+BD of 3./NSGr. 1).

There seems to be a common thread of Junkers types here.

Stig Jarlevik 8th June 2016 11:04

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Nick

Your Ju 52/3m WNr 58634 (KGr 100) in 1940 looks odd. Seems to be one digit too many? Can you confirm?

Cheers
Stig

RT 8th June 2016 11:43

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
5458 is NQ+AV

NQ+AU was 5480

Rémi

Nick Beale 8th June 2016 13:20

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
It could refer to the Werk Nummer of the motor — the wording is ambiguous:
CX/JQ/493/17
Restkommando of KGr. 100 Lüneburg, asked on 29/11 [1940] for the records of the middle motor of a/c NQ+AY, W.Nr. 58634.

RT 8th June 2016 13:29

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
No that is the right Wn of the plane, I hv 3 occurances for the NQ+AY, one time 5860, 2 times 5863, most probably the Wn hv to accepted as 5863

Rémi

Ultra for same plane gives 3 diff. Wn, re-transcription not always at best it seems ..

Tom Willis 8th June 2016 15:07

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Hi - I can confirm that NQ+AY with W/Nr 5863 and NQ+AZ with 5864.
But I have the W/Nrs for NQ+AU and NQ+AV the other way around with AU 5458 and AV as 5480. It would appear that NQ+VA is a typo of NQ+AV, hence the same W/Nr.
Regards - Tom

Tony Jones 8th June 2016 15:11

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Tom

The Ju 52 was 5480 was NQ+AV, not VA

Two late NQ+V* were Ju 88 but I have a blank for R

Tony

Stig Jarlevik 8th June 2016 15:46

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Nick/Remi/Tom and Tony

Many thanks for taking the time to confirm what was correct in this case :)

Cheers
Stig

RT 8th June 2016 17:20

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
and NQ+AZ with 5864.


5864 was DK+TI, sometimes is given as 5064/NQ+AZ, but I doubt 5064/given as FT+BL "sic."/ was used by See-Tr. units nd don't match with Ln units....

Most probably Wn for the NQ+AZ is not known

Rémi

Tony, which type of Ju88 do you hv for the NQ+V ,,??

Tony Jones 8th June 2016 17:39

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Remi

Sorry I don't have the sub type but have sent you a pm

Regards

Tony

Tom Willis 8th June 2016 20:59

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Hi Remi - DK+TI has W/Nr.5464

Regards Tom

RT 9th June 2016 08:21

Re: Two Stammkennzeichen
 
Right 5464, a good point for you, sorry

Rémi


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:02.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net