Re: Ghostbombers updates
SES: Thanks, that will be interesting to see.
Heuser: the Gen.Qu. loss data that I used (item 44 in the report of 10.2.45) says »Besatzung unverletzt« and is listed under Luftflotte 10. I./NJG 6 was part of Luftflotte Reich at that time (e.g. the loss of Oblt. Willi Rathmann's Bf 110 W.Nr. 730370 near Reuthlingen on 1 February, with the deaths of all three crew). On 10 January 1945, Stab NAG 6 had 2 (1) Bf 110 G-4/R3 on strength. |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
and what I meant to say was supplementary primary sources.
I just re-sent the mail. bregds SES |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Hi Nick,
surviving German documentation does seem to attribute 730324 to different units. The relevant NJG6 Namentliche Verlustmeldung gives: 10 km nordwestl. Waldmühlenbach b./Heilbronn. 1.2.45 19.15 h Bf 110/G-4 2Z-OK. W.-Nr. 730324, Nr. d. Qu.Meld.: 106 Note that Waldmühlenbach is only some 4.5 km from Roigheim, as mentioned with the NAGr 6 loss... Werner Koch's published transcription of the handwritten KTB of Stab NJG6, "Das Kriegstagebuch des Nachtjagdgeschwaders 6", also gives 730324 as Ofw. Paul Faden's aircraft, but it is unclear if Koch added this data to his manuscript or if the data is cited in the original KTB.... There is no other entry in the surviving Genst.Gen.Qu.6.Abt returns that could relate to Faden's Bf 110. Cheers Rod |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
There is no other entry in the surviving Genst.Gen.Qu.6.Abt returns that could relate to Faden's Bf 110.Which points to two entries getting confused or conflated, but it's pretty hard to tell which was correct. |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Today's Ghost Bombers updates are:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Thanks for your much appreciated additions, Nick. Glières is close to Geneva; good to know what was undertaken by the Luftwaffe there in 44.
Cheers Marc |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Today's updates are:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
550070 DO+L. likely 550570 DO+LT (as 550070 had other Stkz.)
A-17 1022 (can be 0881022) anyways one A-4 ´1022 is known in need of certain spares at Westerland 28.04.44 (Ultra) A-17 801490 is mentioned twice, confusing re-dates / units (but either can be 301490, as no info yet) A-17 801598 3Z+CH already lost 11.05.44 ("LATA & OPS" Thiele; Salonen) (but 0881598 still no fate) Else other II/KG 26 info fills preatty well in. http://www.ghostbombers.com/dragoon/appx2.html Best regards Ed |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
The Ghost Bombers website is 10 years old today.
To mark the occasion, there's an expanded and remastered 25th Anniversary de luxe reissue of an article I had published back in November 1989 about a I./KG 200 spy-dropping mission over Belgium. Many more sources have become available since I researched the original. The other new things this month are:
The Me 262 "S" marking: more about the Sichtungsstelle General der Jagdflieger. Amendments to page layouts, typing corrections, restoration of links and some changes to file structures. |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Hi Nick,
Interesting as always. I find it ironic that no RK was awarded to intercept controllers (JLo) for their vital contribution in obtaining kills in the air. The only RK awarded to Ln-personnel were for ground action. Please see: http://www.gyges.dk/Jlo%20abschuessse.pdf for a listing of intercepts resulting in confirmed kills. The unit was given credit for kills and this was mentioned in the monthly summary of the JK. But the action at DIESTELFINK was certainly the result of outstanding leadership. bregds SES |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Nick,
Congrats! Ten years is forever in this age... Excellent, original research and a great site -- thanks for sharing. Regards, Leon Venter |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Hello Nick,
I have some small idea of the difficulty of what you have done for 10+ years. I am also appreciative of the quality of your website and the data presented therein. I guess this my long-winded way of saying, “Thank you sir. You are appreciated.” Steve Sheflin |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Thank you very much, Nick, for your so fantastic work during these 10 years.
Pierre |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Nick,
Selfless toil and contribution has its own intrinsic reward, but the occasional pat on the back is nice, too. ;) L. :) |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Thank you Nick,
for your enduring publication endeavour, shareing your always reliable and well referened research results with us in a so well structured focused way. I hope that your motivation, engagement, health and what ever is needed in addition, will let you enjoyed it and carry on for a long time. So, best wishes for 2015! Martin |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
I've just posted the first updates of the New Year:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
1 Attachment(s)
Hi Nick,
Thanks very much for your continuous efforts and generous sharing for a decade, this website of yours is great. Regarding your Nachtjagdstaffel Norwegen article, below photograph has recently been auctioned on ebay, http://www.ebay.com/itm/281582548112. This Ju88G-6 was apparently captured at Flensburg and displays a black starboard underwing as well as the white spinner spiral, similar to other aircraft of that unit. The fuselage is camouflaged with heavy Wellenmuster, again, a feature apparent for example at Bf110G-4 B4+KA or Ju88G-6 B4+SA. Close examination does unfortunately not provide clarity, but the aircraft might carry B4+AA marking. The IWM has a photograph where the tail of our subject is visible behind a Ju88A and it supports at least the +AA interpretation. Kind regards Mathias |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Hi Mathias,
Vey nice shot thanks for sharing. AA does not sound like a very likely code since this would be the Geschw.Kodore. aircraft and this was just a Staffel. bregds SES |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Thanks for your interest and for your comments on the site. NJ Staffel Norwegen did have an AA but it was their one He 219. I think I can see a small "9" to the left of this Ju 88's Balkenkreuz.
It can't be G9 because NJG 1 had no Ju 88s (I think!). So NJG 5 (C9), NJG 9 (D9) or NJG 101 (9W) maybe? |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Thanks, SES, Nick.
@SES, as far as I understand, all NJ Staffel Norwegen aircraft carried B4+xA codes, despite being a Staffel. @Nick, C9+AA actually is documented as the mount of Major Schoenert, Ju88G-6 WNr. 620788 with up and down facing antennas mounted on the rear fuselage. It was captured at Eggebeck airfield. Kind regards Mathias |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Hi Mathias,
Yes I think you are right. bregds SES |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
actually not sure if C9+AA could be called a regular mount as another famous pilot of NJG 5 also flew the bird and not necessarily with the odd fuselage aerials ............ hope this makes some sense
E ` |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Today's updates to Ghost Bombers are as follows:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
For your ongoing efforts, this member of an admiring public thanks you.
GRM |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Today's updates to Ghost Bombers are:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Nick - Thanks for the DEFE3 update. You've repeated a paragraph on Page One.
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Quote:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
where's the 'like' button!
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Today's updates to Ghost Bombers are:
… and no end of layout corrections. |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Nick - Thanks for the piece on 3./NAG 13. The Fi 156 you mention Frank Stout as having shot down was almost certainly piloted by Heinz Lex of Transportstaffel 40.
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
I've posted all kinds of updates to the site this morning:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Nick, a big thank you for your enduring effort to research and share your results with us!
It is always a true pleasure to surf your ghostbomber site for example for my beloved recce units (e.g. German jet recce planes and missons) and any new Bf109 WNr out of the WNF production from losses PR strenght reports and your Welle researched Liftings. And not to forget the stories of the people mentioned, often as victims. |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
I've posted the following updates to the site this morning:
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
"Bf 109G - 14, W.Nr.460382, blue 1, damage 15%, 05 September 1944
First reported as "apparently blown up by Aerodrome Command on account of damage to undercarriage and wings." On 18/9 confirmed as 15% damaged, not observed by the enemy, no personnel losses, turned over to Aerodrome Command, Antwerp-Deurne. [Found by the Allies: DB 605 A-1 No. 00205227. MW 50. “Badly looted.”]" Antwerpen was liberated on September 4, 1944, the last lorries of Erla VII left Antwerpen on September 3, 1944, 05 pm, and the Geman Aerodrome Command was there on September 18, 1944? Quite strange! |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Nick,
The name you have "corrected" is really Oefele. I have confirmed this from the EKM-list at WASt. You can make sure of this matter by checking for example the following: http://www.library.yale.edu/catalogi...ic/fraktur.htm or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraktur There is some similarity between "D" and "O", but this case is very clear. Matti |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Thanks for the comments.
Rasmussen: I think that the message implied only that the information from Deurne had arrived by 18 September. For example, the Fliegerhorst Kommandantur may have arrived back in Germany with its records and was informing units what had happened to their aircraft. I had more trouble with the losses at Beauvechain. Knowing that Leuven was liberated on 4 September, I was surprised that Beauvechain hadn't been evacuated sooner. Matti: I went back to the NVM (typewritten, thankfully) and you're right, it is "Oefele." |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Thank you Nick !
|
Re: Ghostbombers updates
Gentlemen,
I wonder how many sorties in total of Oberfeldwebel Jurgen Campsen that he flew before he lost his life on Feb. 24,1945? I know that Campsen made 450 sorties before he was shot down the first time on October 29,1944. Sincerely, Edward L. Hsiao |
Re: Ghostbombers updates
The latest updates to Ghost Bombers are:
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net