Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=52536)

Jukka Juutinen 13th November 2018 22:52

Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
Years ago George Hopp posted here (or some other LW forum) a German analysis comparing Bf 109 and Spitfire manufacturing the analysis finding the Spitfire cheaper to build. Anyone with Hopp's document or his full post?

sidney 13th November 2018 23:11

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
According to the book The Decisive Duel: Spitfire Vs 109, the Bf 109 required less man-hours (i.e., for the Bf 109 G produced by Messerschmitt, the figure was only 4,500 man-hours, excluding herewith the equipment (radios) and armament) to manufacture than Spitfire, so on the face of it, 109 would be cheaper to build.

Jukka Juutinen 14th November 2018 05:12

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
I don't trust that book. Plus I am looking for the document Hopp posted and his commentary.

Nick Beale 14th November 2018 08:30

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
It was undoubtedly cheaper (in money terms) to build a 109 since the Germans were using foreign forced labour and slavery on a massive scale.

Alfred.MONZAT 14th November 2018 08:47

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
The Spitfire is know as an industrial nightmare (more than 10,000 man-hours IIRC) so I would also like to see what would made the Spitfire cheaper than the Bf 109, particulary after what said the aformentioned book.

Bruce Dennis 14th November 2018 09:55

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jukka Juutinen (Post 260664)
I don't trust that book.

What have you found that is incorrect in the book?

Bruce

Jukka Juutinen 15th November 2018 06:32

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alfred.MONZAT (Post 260666)
The Spitfire is know as an industrial nightmare (more than 10,000 man-hours IIRC) so I would also like to see what would made the Spitfire cheaper than the Bf 109, particulary after what said the aformentioned book.

Then take a look at Rüdiger Kosin's The German Fighter since 1915. He also criticizes 109 structure as difficult to construct. And given Kosin's background, I believe him over David C. Isby any day.

The document George Hopp quoted was based on the assumption of the Spitfire being built by German industry. This makes the comparison much more valid.

Bruce Dennis 15th November 2018 09:35

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
What have you found in the book 'The Decisive Duel: Spitfire Vs 109' to be incorrect?

Jukka Juutinen 15th November 2018 17:09

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
It's a long time since I read samples of the book, but my instant reaction at that time was "Oh no, another regurgitation without archival research".

Bruce Dennis 15th November 2018 17:17

Re: Bf 109 vs. Spitfire production costs
 
I am glad to tell you that there was a great deal of archival research put into the book. There are 53 pages of source notes at the end giving many, many file refs.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net