Re: eBay: Allied intrest
Quote:
Faenor Thanks I think 2 different QJ-E - I don't see "523" at all in the new ebay photo but I do not see "523" One also looks obviously "POW" the other does not! Paul |
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
Quote:
Now some of the (Bull)dust has settled, I'm first to admit I inadvertently numbered Image No.1 (Spitfire), as No.2 Kittyhawk). I stick by my conclusions on both images. Col. |
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
|
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
Quote:
Interesting discussion. Looks like I am "ten years after", nothing unusual with that....:) Always nice when a photo suddenly appears confirming earlier suspicions. When it comes to photo "1 and 2" (Spitfire/Kittyhawk) I confess I agree with Col on both aircraft. The digits, at least those I can faintly see on photo 1 are "47" which supports his ID. His unfortunate mistake of listing both his IDs under no 2 was quite easy to understand. Cheers Stig |
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
Hi all,
nice photo of Hawker Hurricane mk. I - probably P2644 lost 8.6.1940 during transfer to Malta: https://www.ebay.de/itm/Orig-Foto-en...Paoq:rk:1:pf:0 Faenor |
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
....another Hurricane from france 1940 - SDoP from 501.Sq - looking for more info:
https://www.ebay.de/itm/Britisches-J...QdnM:rk:2:pf:0 Faenor |
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
.....Spitfire - with date 1941, but looks like some machine from 1940 around Dunkerque :
https://www.ebay.de/itm/Orig-Foto-en...Pani:rk:6:pf:0 Faenor |
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
|
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
|
Re: eBay: Allied intrest
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net