Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Allied and Soviet Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   defect in the unhooking of the bombs (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=51403)

Elenaz 22nd June 2018 10:11

defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
hello
I'm writing the story of the planes crashed in Veneto (Italy) during the second world war. I noticed that many planes crashed because they exploded due to a defect in the unhooking of the bombs. I'm looking for material related to this problem. Is there an investigation file? Does anyone have information to help me deepen this topic? Thank you for every help.
Elena

John Beaman 25th June 2018 15:39

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
Which air force(s) or types of aircraft?

ClinA-78 25th June 2018 16:42

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
Elena,

You may contact il signor Freddy Furlan from FVG, senior member on https://www.archeologidellaria.org/index.php
He wrote an article about that problem encountered by some P-40's of the DAF.

Auguri

ClinA-78

Elenaz 27th June 2018 12:37

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
ClinA - 78,thank you so much. Freddy is a dear friend of mine. I did not know he had treated the subject. I phone him right away.

Elena

Elenaz 27th June 2018 12:59

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
For John Beaman:

The squadrons involved in these "incidents" are different:
111° Sqn. RAF (Chapman)
417° Sqn. RCAF (Cotnam)
72° Sqn. RAf (Jennings)
43° Sqn. RAF (Holliss)
93° Sqn. RAF (Allen?)
450° Sqn. RAf (Wingfield).

There are not only these aircraft fallen between the Romagna and the Veneto. Now I can not find any more, but I will do a specific job of collecting data to analyze in detail which squadrons received faulty bombs.

Elenaz 27th June 2018 13:01

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
John,

As you can see, however, the squadrons that received faulty bombs were mostly those of the 324th Wing.

Elena

Elenaz 28th June 2018 12:53

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
Freddy Furlan told me more cases of crashed aircraft for the same reason. They would be 450° RAAF, 3rd Sqn. SAAF and 454° (of which I do not know anything), Apart from this
Squadron, I understand that the wing involved in the failure to release the bomb were 239° and 324°.
Airplanes involved: Spitfires, Kittyhawk, Mustang.

John Beaman 28th June 2018 16:54

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elenaz (Post 253943)
For John Beaman:

The squadrons involved in these "incidents" are different:
111° Sqn. RAF (Chapman)
417° Sqn. RCAF (Cotnam)
72° Sqn. RAf (Jennings)
43° Sqn. RAF (Holliss)
93° Sqn. RAF (Allen?)
450° Sqn. RAf (Wingfield).

There are not only these aircraft fallen between the Romagna and the Veneto. Now I can not find any more, but I will do a specific job of collecting data to analyze in detail which squadrons received faulty bombs.

thanks. good info

Stig Jarlevik 28th June 2018 18:14

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Beaman (Post 253869)
Which air force(s) or types of aircraft?

Surely by now should be in the Allied section?

Cheers
Stig

John Beaman 28th June 2018 21:17

Re: defect in the unhooking of the bombs
 
Stig I just wanted to see if you were alert.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:07.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net