Photo Fokker D.II/D.III
 

Hello,


Currently on ebay a nice line up of Fokker D.II preceded by Fokker E.IV 183/16 of Kest 5 at :


https://www.ebay.de/itm/Original-Fot...YAAOSwqNdec2bt


Regards,


Clint

Re: Photo Fokker D.II
 

Clint

It is clearly a mix of both Fokker D.II (four) and D.III (two), with the D.III closest to the camera. The two D.II in the background seems to be flanked by a Halberstadt fighter. An extremely interesting photo by the way.

Cheers
Stig

Re: Photo Fokker D.II
 

Hello Stig,


You're completely corrrect and as you say it is also clear!


Can you read the serial on the D.III in the cente at all, either third from the left or right?


Regards,


Clint

Re: Photo Fokker D.II
 

Well Clint

My guesses before have not been very successful, so I think I pass this time...:D

Cheers
Stig

Re: Photo Fokker D.II
 

Stig,


What annoys me about myself is that its sooo d*mn obvious, if I'd only taken the time to look properly... Note to self. Don't do this again!


Regards,


Clint

Re: Photo Fokker D.II
 

Well Clint

Seems you just quote me....
But at least I am going to do many more mistakes before my life is over!

Cheers
Stig

Re: Photo Fokker D.II
 

Stig,


Well, I'm concerned that the olympics may be cancelled due to the corona virus. I had believed that I had serious medal hopes in the competetive cumulative error event.


Regards,


Clint

Re: Photo Fokker D.II/D.III
 

Hello,


Currently on ebay there is an interesting photo of Fokker D.II 524/16 at:


https://www.ebay.de/itm/PORTRAIT-WK-...kAAOSw3cBerAbv


Has anyone a known unit that operated the aircraft shown?


Regards,


Clint

Re: Photo Fokker D.II/D.III
 

Clint

To be honest I think I see a digit 1 in front which would thus make it 1524/16 (or even 1504/16, but I also think it is a digit 2 and not a 0)

Cheers
Stig

Re: Photo Fokker D.II/D.III
 

Hello Stig,


You're absolutely right there is a 1. I didn't see it good spot.I'll amend my excel doc accordingly!



Regards,


Clint