Nov3 ,1942 Luftwaffe loss.
 

1942 Nov3 6.30am on coastal road between El Alamein and Mersa Matruh 260 Sq Kittyhawk2 collided with ME109F , cutting fuselage in half: Kittyhawk lost left wing. ME109 pilot killed :Kittyhawk pilot badly hurt gash in thigh from antenna on bailing out.

Could anyone confirm the name of ME 109 pilot?
For some reason the German officers who interrogated the canadian pilot after he was operated on at field hospital were very agitated about circumstances of death of Me109 pilot.He thought they were very polite,but wanting to know all details of incident, apparently ME109 pilot was well known though he didnt recognise name.

Incident was witnessed by other A/c of 260sq ,SqL Devonish in command.

thanks if anyone can help

Robert

Re: Nov3 ,1942 Luftwaffe loss.
 

Robert,

I started looking at my reference books.It seems that it was probably a JG-77 Bf-109. The funny thing was that on Nov 3,1942 Lt. Edgard Berres, a well know ace, was shot down and survived after a parachute landing. No mention of a collision.
However, on Nov. 2,1942, another JG-77 ace,Uffz Horst Schlick, had a collision with a P-40! He survived after a parachute landing.
By the way, in the book "JG-77 Vol 3", the narrative of Horst Schlick mentions that Lt. Berres bailed out on the same day,NOT Nov. 3,1942. Another mystery.

Re: Nov3 ,1942 Luftwaffe loss.
 

Or the fist book may be right and both the collision and bailout of Berres occured on the 3rd...

Re: Nov3 ,1942 Luftwaffe loss.
 

The RAF plilot seemed to think pilot was killed,in fact this was confirmed by German interrogators later that day and subsequently.

Re: Nov3 ,1942 Luftwaffe loss.
 

I forgot to say that date is accurate 3 nov from Log book.


Robert

Re: Nov3 ,1942 Luftwaffe loss.
 

Hi Robert

Just a couple of points.

Log books are only as accurate as the writer makes them. I know from personal experience from my "pilot days" how easy it is to make a note on some scrap paper because your log book is somewhere where you can't find it at the time. When you DO find it you can't locate your scrap paper and you enter from memory. Many pilots I am sure were perfect while others were sloppy, so just to state something is taken from a log book is NOT Gospel! Neither do you tell us whose log book you are quoting from. That detail could be useful. You don't state the 260 Sq pilots name. Any particular reason?

Checking for instance Fighters over the Desert, there is not mentioned any combat at all by 260Sq on Nov 3rd in 1942. However on Nov 4th we find almost exactly the combat you mention, where 12 Kittyhawks from 260Sq while escorting bombers met 4 Me 109, one of which F/O Gilboe collided with. Both aeroplanes crashed. Since there were no corresponding losses from the German side, the authors believe this was 4 Macchi MC 202 from 18 Gruppo that scrambled early that morning after some Boston bombers and Curtiss fighters. Tenente Bordoni Bisleri claimed one Curtiss shot down which in turn had just shot down his comrade Cap Pinna. The Italian records obviously does not mention any collission, but remember that air combat is a very fast activity and pilots are under severe stress so you have a tendency of tunnel vision, which makes it hard to observe every small detail of a combat. Aeroplane recognition was bad, or better said what you could expect. You mostly had one chance to ID your oponent. If you elected to take a second look you had a great chance of ending up dead. So most pilots tended to identify his foe with the most dangerous aeroplane in the sky at a given time.
The British rarely stated they had met Italians, since the German were considered more deadly, so everything fighter was a Me 109.
In spite of happening in such a "small" area, the Desert war is a tough one to co-relate, much was happening more or less at the same time, early mornings and late evenings when the temperature was most favourable. Action was at low altitude which made long range vision hard, so combats could take place quite near to each other without the different combatants seing each other.

Finally this is of course not Gospel either, since my source by now is quite old, although I have not seen anything really replacing it.

I suppose most of all Robert we need you to fill in the blanks and add ALL you got.

Cheers
Stig Jarlevik
Gothenburg Sweden

Re: Nov3 ,1942 Luftwaffe loss.
 

I wonder if this might be the incident:

Bf 109G-2/trop, 10665, Stöckmann, Uffz. Heinrich, , 9., JG 77, gelbe, 7 +, , , 02-Nov-42, POW after Luftkampf with Spitfire. FSA., , Afrika, Gen.Qu.6.Abt. (mfm #8)-Vol.14; Prien, et al, Die Jagdfliegerverbände, VIII.2, p.333; Prien, JG 77, III, p.1313, , Raum El Alamein, 100%, F



or this:



Bf 109F-4/trop, 8579, , , 5., JG 27, , , , , 03-Nov-42, Destroyed by own troops after engine damage., Loss report says WNr. 8597., Afrika, Gen.Qu.6.Abt. (mfm #7)-Vol.12; Prien, et al, Die Jagdfliegerverbände, VIII.1, p.289; Prien/Rodeike/Stemmer, II./JG 27, p.531, , Marsa Matruk, 100%, F