![]() |
Me262 O'Connell book
Going thru this book, nd quoting as high as possible his quality, I noted that some conflicts remained nd found that there is still many "???", has Dan. O'Connell made any complements , has he plan to make some ??
regards Rémi |
Re: Me262 O'Connell book
Dear Remi,
Thank you for your kind words. I agree there are still many unanswered questions about the Me 262. I have not been informed of any possibility of a re-print, but as I find new information, I add it to the original manuscript, on the possibility that they may want to print a revised edition in the future. I hope that happens, as I continue to find new information. Is there a specific question that you have? Very best wishes, Dan |
Re: Me262 O'Connell book
As an aside Dan, has much new info surfaced since publication?
Cheers Peter D Evans LEMB Administrator |
Re: Me262 O'Connell book
Hi Peter, WNr are now up to 1,224 :-) Probably 5 pages more material; a new sentence here, a new one there. It adds up!
|
Re: Me262 O'Connell book
Dan,
Could you perhaps consider to publish these as an erratum on this website or Peter one? The investment of a second edition can of course be justified, but... It would be great! |
Re: Me262 O'Connell book
Not bad as an idea...
Some losses hv amazed me, the ones occured on february at Giebelstadt 120539+120549+.. the docs say Bü181c-3 for them, seems the Wn valid for this type, hv you found any doc that state , these are in fact Me262 ??? Remi |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net