![]() |
Spitfire EHT
1 Attachment(s)
Hi,
W/C Eric H. Thomas DFC* the Biggin Hill Wing Leader used shortly brand new Spitfire IX in late 1942 as his personal mount. See attached picture. Does anyone know or identify the s/n please ? TIA & regards, Michal |
Re: Spitfire EHT
Probably BR369.
|
Re: Spitfire EHT
BR369 Vc 2816 HPA M46 FF 14-4-42 R-RH 16-4-42 Cv IX M61 340S 'GW-R' 29-11-42 AST mods 22-2-43 341S 9-3-43 engine failed on approach Biggin Hill wheels up landing CB 25-3-43 recat E
http://www.spitfires.ukf.net/p029.htm |
Re: Spitfire EHT
Gentlemen,
Thanks for reply and the tip. It seems that BR369 is not the right s/n however. This a/c appears as "GW-R" from the beginning of November in the 340 Sqn ORB. In two entries, W/C Thomas is mentioned in unknown a/c when another FAFL pilot used "R" on the same sweep. Could be the right s/n from BS serie ? Regards, Michal |
Re: Spitfire EHT
Wojtek, PM sent.
Michal |
Re: Spitfire EHT
Quote:
In my notes I have BR369 as EHT during summer 1942, with a question mark regarding later months of 1942. IIRC this serial-code tie-up can be found in "Combat Codes" by Andy Thomas/Vic Flintham and in "Late Marque Spitfire Aces" by Dr Alfred Price. Quote:
|
Re: Spitfire EHT
Quote:
Quote:
Next ops on 6/11, including Thomas (with unknown s/n) shows BS247 as new "G" with 340 Sqn, and BS240 dissapeared. BS247/G participated on all another ops in November, mainly used by S/L Duperier. He previously (until 2-6/11) flew his brand new BS392 with nice nose art ... and could changed it on the same day when Thomas took over BS240. So, maybe bingo ! |
Re: Spitfire EHT
The snag is that the Spitfire in the photo you have posted does not seem to show any sign of overpainted previous codes.
|
Re: Spitfire EHT
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I am not expert for factory marking but is there a chance to trace up something from detail near individual letter ? See attachement. Michal |
Re: Spitfire EHT
It looks like "6S" followed by several digits, which is the Supermarine construction number (I'm not sure if it's for the fuselage or the entire airframe). That's why I think the aeroplane has not been repainted, as I don't think anyone would bother re-applying it after the fuselage was repainted.
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net