3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

On eBay here is an interesting photo of a crashed Klemm Kl35. The aircraft has the vbkz 4N+AL and presumably then an aircraft of 3.(F)/Aufkl.Gr.22. On the rear are some details of the crash, unfortunately this becomes increasingly unreadable. The date 6.7.43 is clear, and the crew appear to be a Ofw Falke and Oblt ?. Can anyone provide more details?


Cheers


Ian

Re: 3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

1943-07-06, 3.(F)/22, Kl 35, 2305, DD+BX, Fl.Pl. Dno, Notlandung infolge Motorstörung. Bruch 50 %.
Flugzeugführer Olt Paul, Erwin, verletzt
Beobachter Ofw Falke, Karl, verletzt

Matti

Re: 3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

Thanks Matti for this quick response

Cheers
Ian

Re: 3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

Another one of those danged WNr. conflicts. I have the following from the Gen.Qu. loss records: 06-Jul-43, , Kl 35, 3091, Paul, Oblt. Erwin, , , 3.(F), 22, , 4N+AL, DH+CH, , Crew injured in crash due to engine trouble., B Ofw. Karl Falke, , Lfl.1/Eins.Osten, Gen.Qu.6.Abt. (mfm #11)-Vol.19; e-Bay photo, , Fl.Pl. Dno, 50%, H,

Matti, I presume you have the report from the WASt or NLV?

Re: 3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

To add to the confusion... according to http://www.stammkennzeichen.de/

Kl 35, 3088, DH+CH
Kl 35, 3091, DH+CK

...all part of a Kl 35 block

DD+BX is shown to have been with 3(F)/22 since Aug 1941.

Ian

Re: 3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

Yes, my info is from NVM. I know, that in GQM WNr. is 3091, but I think, that NVM is more reliable (at least so far). Confusion continues.

Matti

Re: 3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

Matti, agreed that the NVM are usually the more reliable source. Agravating as it may be, resolving these conflicts is what continues to make this stuff so interesting. All I can say is thank you for your continued efforts in helping the members of this forum.

Re: 3.(F)/AufklGr22 loss 6/7/1943?
 

You are welcome, Jim! I am always happy, when I can solve somebody's problem (and not so happy, when I cannot).

Matti