Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944 (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=37188)

Tony Kearns 16th March 2014 20:27

Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
On the morning of 27September 1944 (08.25hrs) P/O Sid Bregman 441 RCAF Sqn.shot down a Bf109 in the Arnhem area. Could anybody identify the pilot, unit and Identity of the Bf109 please?
F/Lt Copeland and F/Lt Lake also claimed a Bf109 each in this incident.
Regards
Tony K

John Manrho 16th March 2014 23:20

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
Without a doubt combat was with II./JG 77 which suffered multiple losses.

Tony Kearns 16th March 2014 23:38

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
Thanks John, I knew that it would be a difficult question but its a great start.
Regards
Tony K

ouidjat 17th March 2014 00:23

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
... And JG 4 and one JG 53 so far...

Tony Kearns 17th March 2014 13:47

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ouidjat (Post 181700)
... And JG 4 and one JG 53 so far...

Thank you ouidjat, do you mean those units too were involved in that particular engagement at 08.25 hrs. ?
Regards
Tony K

ouidjat 17th March 2014 14:57

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
Hi Tony,

I mean I have 13 Bf 109s in my little « lost list » for that day over Holland:
6 from JG 77, 4 x JG 4, 1 x JG 76, 1 x JG 53, 1 x JG 27.
Among them, in Arnhem and/or Arnhem area: 3 x JG 77, 1 x JG 53 and 1 x JG 4.
I have nothing about the time … Sorry.

Ah yes: since this list is extracted from the "on line" Holland Air force Historical blablabla (verliesregister_1944_tcm46-154755 or SGLO-Verlieslijst-T-1944-versie-05-2013-01-15) I suppose that indicated places are crash places, not necessarily the place where the fights did stand.
It is possible, though, that there is a Time indication in this list but I know I've jumped it over and I did start to update it. I haven't finished, sorry ... :)

Last minute: I did check it right now: Whatever my updates, I do confirm there is no hour given for German losses that day.

Regards, Franck.

John Manrho 17th March 2014 15:40

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
Exactly why I already said II./JG 77 is the only candidate.....

Timewise only the losses of II./JG 77 match. All other losses were at different times. Research is more than checking the internet and reading books alone....:-)))).....so, as II./JG 77 lost several a/c in the combat it is almost impossible to say who shot down who unless there are detailed descriptions in the P.E.R. of the Allied Unit involved which can be matched with known crash locations.

John

ouidjat 17th March 2014 16:00

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
Hi John,

In other words: "I wrote books, I know, You did read my books, but you still don't know"?

Are the documents I'm talking about above bad done because they are on Internet or were they already bad done BEFORE to be put in line??

What did they miss you know but you didn't put in your books?

You have, too, the free open democratic and simple possibility of writing when answering to such question "Only II./JG 77 was involved in air combat on that day at that time in that area" ... for example.

It's clear ... and fair.

Be good, Franck.

Tony Kearns 17th March 2014 18:23

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
1 Attachment(s)
Thanks Franc for that additional gen, it all helps to clarify.

John, I appreciate the difficulties of identifying just who shot down whom, but the help in identifying the units involved progresses it for me. Dare I ask, were the losses from all three staffels?
I perhaps should clarify; the questions arise as a result of research into five Spitfires IX which survived the war and were converted to two seat trainers for the Irish Air Corps. I have the histories of the Spitfires from my visits to Kew and from the Irish log books. But my lack of German is my stumbling block and too old to start learning the language now. Computer skills can best be summed up by the attached.
I ask for the patience of this forum when my other questions arise.
Thank you gentlemen.
Regards,
Tony K

John Manrho 17th March 2014 22:47

Re: Identity of BF109 claim by P/O Sid Bregman 27Sept.1944
 
To Tony;

Stab II./JG 77 flew with all Staffeln (5. 6. and 7.). I do not believe a 8. Staffel existed yet. Take off with 26 Bf 109 from Werl at 08.40 hours (one hour time difference with GMT so this is 07.40 hours Allied time). Losses were;

Lt. Lothar Peemüller (5. Staffel), killed, near Borken.
Hptm. Franz Hrdlicka (5. Staffel), wounded, 6 km south Bocholt.
Uffz. Walter Quandel (5. Staffel), slightly injured, 6 km south Arnhem.
Uffz. Franz Gollner, (5. Staffel), killed, Raum Arnhem-Nijmegen.
Uffz. Hans Röhrig (5. Staffel), killed, near Lobith.
Gefr. Horst Ullmann (5. Staffel), killed, Doornenburg (recovered 1993).
Gefr. Alfred Hoffschmidt (6. Staffel), wounded, Raum Nijmegen.
Uffz. Herbert Plackmeyer (6. Staffel), killed, near Borken.
Uffz. Franz Mayer (6. Staffel), missing, Raum Nijmegen.
Fj.Fw. Klaus Rüter (7. Staffel), killed, near Rhede.

II./JG 77 also claimed two Spitfires. One by Maj. Freytag (at 09.23 hrs, being 08.23 hrs Allied time) and by Uffz. Quandel at 10.00 hrs. As Uffz. Quandel was shot down also his claim must have been reported after his return to the Gruppe. Time might be approximate.

To Franck,

My statement was a general one and not specific directed to you. Also nothing to do with if I wrote a book or not. It is about doing proper research. I have noticed lately that many people on this forum only do "desk" research and not serious research. It are those that "demand" proof from the serious researcher to substantiate statements. I particular did not like the "brownish" discussion on LEMB and TOCH. Unfortunately several people who do serious research are not on this forum anymore. Why would that be?

Concerning this discussion, indeed I should have been more clearer in my initial contribution to explain why I reached that conclusion. But, on the other hand.....why would I bother answering questions at all........

Regards,

John.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net