A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

Good morning

what are your comments on this beautiful fairing ?

size is 82cm X 18 cm.

Thanks for your replies

GC

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

I think its Ju 188! 088/5707 (A-4) was lost at sea in MTO, another reported amendment is incorrect. A-4 088/5707 was made before parts usually were marked hlr (ATG) but 5xxx (fuselage) line numbers were used on Ju 188 A-2/D-2´s. This is perhaps about 50 to 100 planes before end of ATG/SFW production. Need check this better tonight.

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

hlc: Zieh und Stanwerk GmbH Schleusingen/Thuringen

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

Hello

I think the code is "h l r"

Rene

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

Think you are right Reiner

It should be then: ATG, Algemeine Transport Anlage GmbH Maschinenfabrik Leipzig W32

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

It is from a Ju88...not a Ju188.

The werk number (5707) is only for the part itself, and is not the aircraft werk number.

This is a fuselage access panel.

Sadly, I do not have access to my parts manual...so I cannot tell you where it was located for the moment.

Mike

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

You disagree? Fine. Study of all dataplates for Ju 88 series over several years leads me to not change my mind. Besides who said this was the a/c W.Nr. I certainly did not. On the contrary. Read better.
Besides checking June 1941 parts list of Ju 88 A-4 / D-1 finds no higher than 88.170 and that was for Ju 88 B-1 cockpit (and 88.190 was totally other special parts for A-6/A-8 ballon cutters).

-ed

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

Already said that in reply #2. hlr was ATG
-Ed

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

Ed,

Almost EVERY reply I see from you has some arrogant and egotistical attitude behind it.

It is certainly not called for, and is pretty immature....

Your statement:

"088/5707 (A-4) was lost at sea in MTO"... CLEARLY states that you are referencing "5707" as a MAIN werk number...of a LOST aircraft...in the MTO...

So what did I "misread"?

Rather than telling me I should "read better"....maybe you should be "clearer" in what you are typing, so you do not get your nickers in a twist?

Re: A nice (JU88?) part to identify
 

Yes you did. Only gave the rest of the info i had namely the complete name f the abbr. That you didnt.

But thank you for giving your knowledge on these matters. I for one appreciate your knowledge .

Regards