Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88 (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=46161)

Roger Gaemperle 25th September 2016 09:40

Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
Hello,

can anybody link the St.Kz. KA+WW to the aircraft's serial number? It was a Ju 88.

Thanks,

Roger

Norbert Schuchbauer 25th September 2016 14:48

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
All I can add is that was a G-6.

Regards,
Norbert

Roger Gaemperle 26th September 2016 08:07

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
Hi Norbert,

Thank you. This aircraft was at Rechlin in winter 1944/45, but I don't know for what purpose.

Regards,

Roger

Peter Achs 28th September 2016 13:23

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
If you ask me, I knew the answer.:D

Peter

Roger Gaemperle 28th September 2016 15:27

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
OK then, I ask you Peter :-) Can you tell me the W.Nr. of KA+WW (either here or via PM)?

Thank you!

Roger

John Beaman 28th September 2016 22:13

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Achs (Post 223795)
If you ask me, I knew the answer.:D

Peter

Peter, why be mysterious? Just post what you know.

John

Stig Jarlevik 29th September 2016 11:15

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
...or even better Peter

Get that Ju 88/188 book(s) of yours published! :D
Some of us have been waiting for years by now ;)

Cheers
Stig

Peter Achs 1st October 2016 13:32

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
Yes, I'm writing and writing (when I have time). :) 50000 words and have just finished the 0- and "Stammwerkserie".

Peter

Stig Jarlevik 1st October 2016 13:48

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
Good Luck then Peter

Guess we have to wait a bit longer, ehh? ;)

Cheers
Stig

ArtieBob 15th October 2016 14:26

Re: Stammkennzeichen KA+WW Ju 88
 
Dear Roger,

Based on some very fuzzy information, if KA+WQ was W.Nr.622317, then KA+WW should have been W.Nr.622323. See if that fits in your scenario.

Best Regards,

ArtieBob


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net