Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   me109E1 or 3 (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=47351)

Mr Schmitt 10th February 2017 12:14

me109E1 or 3
 
Hi,

Does anyone know what variant me109E Werk Nr 5329 was or any information?

Thanks
Kind Regards Edward

harrison987 10th February 2017 15:19

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
My info indicates it as being an E-4. PG+BW.

Mike

G.R.Morrison 10th February 2017 21:10

Bf 109E WNr.5329
 
The WNr.5329 was listed as a Bf 109E-7 of the II.(Schl.)/LG 2 when it had a take-off accident at Berzniki on the first day of Barbarossa (22-Jun-1941).

WNr.5329 in the 2./JG 106
30.August 1943 - Landing accident at Fl.Pl. Lachen-Speyerdorf, damaged 10%.
8.November 1943 - Pilot error at Fl.Pl. Lachen-Speyerdorf, damaged 25%.
11.April 1944 - Fw. Herbert Mayer killed in a crash due to technical failure near Landau; altitude sickness per Menke.

Hope this helps, GRM

Mr Schmitt 11th February 2017 13:30

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
Hi Guys,

Thanks for the info thats very kind.

Would this have been for example, an Erla built E4 then converted to E7 or built E7?

Thanks again
Edward

ju55dk 11th February 2017 14:46

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
From start it was an E-4. Build by WNF.

Junker

Mr Schmitt 11th February 2017 14:50

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ju55dk (Post 229534)
From start it was an E-4. Build by WNF.

Junker

Thank you Junker,

When would this have been built?

Kind Regards

Stig Jarlevik 12th February 2017 00:57

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
Guys

Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328...:confused:
Annoying I know...even to me....:mad:

GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual

Thanks
Stig

ju55dk 12th February 2017 01:48

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
I also have it as Skz PG+BW.

Junker

Stig Jarlevik 12th February 2017 11:56

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
Hi Junker

By 'it', do you mean WNr 5328 or 5329?

Cheers
Stig

ouidjat 13th February 2017 10:14

Re: me109E1 or 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stig Jarlevik (Post 229585)
Guys

Since no one has anything to say vs Harrison's statement that WNr 5329 was PG+BW I have from previous statements (I hope...) that STKZ as WNr 5328...:confused:
Annoying I know...even to me....:mad:

GRM has (as always) an impressive 'future' for this individual

Thanks
Stig

Hi Stig,

According http://www.stammkennzeichen.de/index.php?pge=search and Peter van Gogh list (ex LEMB Stkz data list) WNr.5329 was PG+BW.
Note:
PG+BO was WNr.5296 then comes PG+BQ with WNr.5323 in Gogh list.
Stammkennzeichen list is a little bit different.
For them, PG+BR/5299 then PG+BS/5300 then PG+BT/5326 ...

Harrison's statement is correct according these two lists.

Cheers, Franck.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:36.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net