Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Allied and Soviet Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=55045)

Jukka Juutinen 20th September 2019 23:11

Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity
 
What is the recorded maximum number of people carried by a Walrus in flight?

Alex Smart 21st September 2019 00:23

Re: Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity
 
OK Jukka,
From Profile 224, page 47.
" Amphibious Airways of Rabaul bought 2 Seagull V's and 2 Walrus I'd from the RAAF in 1947, and one of each type was used for Charter flying in the New Britain and Solomons areas for charter, air ambulance and Government ASR flying, with licences to carry no fewer than ten(10) passengers in addition to two(2) crew".

There were wartime occasions I believe when ASR a/c had so many rescued aboard that they were unable to take off. One was taken in tow by ship.

Jukka Juutinen 21st September 2019 13:10

Re: Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity
 
Thanks!

ian hunt 21st September 2019 23:19

Re: Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity
 
[quote=Alex Smart;
" ... licences to carry no fewer than ten(10) passengers in addition to two(2) crew".[/QUOTE]

No "fewer"???

Ian

Alex Smart 22nd September 2019 00:57

Re: Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity
 
Hello Ian, that's what it says.
Perhaps contacting David Brown or Charles W. Cain who were responsible for the issue of " Supermarine Walrus & Seagull Variants" ,Profile number 224, may clear the " fewer" issue.

It might have been clearer to have written "no more than ten plus two crew"

As it stands it would suggest that they could not fly unless they had ten or more passengers plus two crew ???

An explanation may be the costs of the flights at that time, maybe it would not cover the cost of expences such as fuel/wages/passenger checks etc unless there were ten passengers, no fewer.So maybe ten passengers was the maximum and that it did not fly with less than ten passengers because of aforementioned costs ???

Additional
Some sources give crew numbers from 2,3 and 4.

Alex

Leendert 22nd September 2019 08:53

Re: Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity
 
With my school English, I suggest "no fewer than ten" here has more to do with amazement that the Walrus was allowed to carry 10 PAX.

Regards,
Leendert

Stig Jarlevik 22nd September 2019 10:37

Re: Supermarine Walrus carrying capacity
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Leendert (Post 275109)
With my school English, I suggest "no fewer than ten" here has more to do with amazement that the Walrus was allowed to carry 10 PAX.
Regards,
Leendert

Funny Leendert
That is exactly how I read it as well!

Cheers
Stig


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net