Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum

Luftwaffe and Allied Air Forces Discussion Forum (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/index.php)
-   Luftwaffe and Axis Air Forces (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Any Crashed Enemy A/C Reports or (Belgian) experts on Le Culot and Charleroi-Gosselies airfields? (http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=56713)

Marc-André Haldimann 2nd April 2020 15:07

Re: Any Crashed Enemy A/C Reports or (Belgian) experts on Le Culot and Charleroi-Gosselies airfields?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcel van Heijkop (Post 285820)
Hi Marc,

Could it be a "7" instead of a "4", i.e. 330273 for the W.Nr. as one source with apparently sharper copies of Crow's photos states? If that's indeed the case, this "little mystery of mine for several years" is finally solved as this I./KG66 aircraft can now be linked to Beauvechain/Le Culot: In the Crashed Enemy Aircraft Report supplied by Nick earlier in this thread we can read that 330273 was (wrongly) attributed by the Allied investigation team for Beauvechain/Le Culot to a Ju 88 A-4. Which is quite reasonable considering that after all the Ju 88 S variants were converted A-4s and that everything that makes it an "S" (engines, smooth glass nose) was either missing or destroyed on this particular aircraft!

Beauvechain/Le Culot would also make perfect sense considering it was one of the airfields used during the retreat by I./KG66 from France (Montidier, then Lille-Vendeville) through Belgium (Brussels-Melsbroek and Beauvechain) and the Nerherlands (Eindhoven) to Germany (Frankfurt Rhein-Main and finally Dedelstorf).

What do you think?

Regards,

Marcel

Marcel,

Your argumentation in favour of W.Nr. 330273 is flawless. Relying fully on my eyeball Mk 1 apparatus, I alas can't confirm the fifth number as being a "7".

Cheers
Marc

Marcel van Heijkop 2nd April 2020 22:00

Re: Any Crashed Enemy A/C Reports or (Belgian) experts on Le Culot and Charleroi-Gosselies airfields?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc-André Haldimann (Post 285857)
Marcel,

Your argumentation in favour of W.Nr. 330273 is flawless. Relying fully on my eyeball Mk 1 apparatus, I alas can't confirm the fifth number as being a "7".

Cheers
Marc

Hi Marc,

Completely agree! I would also love to see that sharper photo myself and check whether it's indeed a "7". At the moment my source is looking for it somewhere in his belongings, so fingers crossed…

Regards,

Marcel


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:16.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2018, 12oclockhigh.net