View Single Post
  #19  
Old 2nd July 2010, 22:38
Nick Beale's Avatar
Nick Beale Nick Beale is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Exeter, England
Posts: 6,184
Nick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the roughNick Beale is a jewel in the rough
Re: History of Fw 190 G-3 160896

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Gaemperle View Post
Hello,

Based on the ULTRA reports that you provided I did a further search for information and ended up with more questions than answers:

Regards,
Roger
1) Remi you stated "Ausb. III./KG51": based on the scan of the corresponding ULTRA report that Nick posted, I don't see the reason why you think it was the Ausb.(ildung) Staffel. That leads me to the 2) question:

I'll leave question 1) to Remi.

2) In the ULTRA report, what does KADOP and R/T Staffel mean? R/T is probably radio telegraphy? Was the (Night) III./KG 51 the Ergänzungsstaffel(Nacht)/SKG 10 (see also question 5)?

KADOP is German code — read the ULTRA article on my website.
KABEK = KG; KABUS = I./KG; KADIK = II./KG; KADOP = III./KG; KAFAN = IV./KG
KEBAD = 1./KG; KEBUT = 2./KG; KEDAC = 3./KG KEDNI = 4./KG; KEFUO = 5./KG; KEGIA = 6./KG; KEKOD = 7./KG; KELAP = 8./KG; KELOA = 9./KG
R/T in this context = Replacement./Training, i.e. «Ergänzung»

3) Nick, would it be possible to post a scan of the first ULTRA report that mentioned W.Nr. 160986? Does this report specifically say Erst. SKG 10?

No, I haven't got it.

4) I tried to find the Ergänzungsstaffel SKG 10 at www.ww2.dk and found two different units with overlapping time (does this make sense?):

http://www.ww2.dk/oob/bestand/schlacht/bergskg10.html

5) Is Ausb.III./KG 51 and Ergänzungsstaffel(Nacht)/SKG 10 one and the same unit?

I don't if there was ever such a thing as "Ausb.III./KG 51."
However, I./SKG 10 became III./KG 51 in June 1944, all the elements of the one were renamed as elements of the other.

> If so, it is interesting to note that in October 1944 4 Fw 190 G-3 left the unit. They are indicated as 'moved to other units'.

It always says that when a unit is redesignated — officially it ceases to exist and a new one is created, even if nothing changed but the name.

> Does somebody know what the source for the Bestandesmeldungen at www.ww2.dk are and how reliable they are?

They are all at the Bundesarchiv-Miltärarchiv in Freiburg. They are as reliable as any other official material from the time, i.e. they reflect the figures that were reported at a particular date and time. A day (or an hour) earlier or later the figures might change; a mistake might be made by whoever made the report.
__________________
Nick Beale
http://www.ghostbombers.com
Reply With Quote