|
Re: He 219 V6/A0 DV+DI
Hi Marcel
I agree that the He 219 and what has been published is full of anomalies and few second hand sources makes much sense, and unfortunately Remp managed to muddy the waters even further.
Unfortunately you are not entirely clear either. Are you saying that the DV+DI actually should have been painted as DH+DI, or are you talking about a whole new STKZ range? Or have you made a misprint here and when you talk about DH+DA and DH+DI you actually mean DV+DA and DV+DI?
When Remp on page 136 talks about 190016, 190020, and on page 134 190022 (as A-093), is it possible this could be 290016 etc (also including the 190038 on page 120)?
Cheers
Stig
|