Quote:
Originally Posted by ouidjat
I don't know, but from an extract - a photocopy - from one of your book for sure. In the same listing we can find a G-16 too ... must be a typo.
That the code was or not used isn't explained.
|
That was in 1984 and three more books have been published since, correcting and improving info.
Moreover, even then the "2-5" was indicated as "cancelled", which, even for inexperienced authors as we were at that time, was some sort of indication, or at least we thought so...
Nor that I blame me or you for that, only that there are many info in the ANR section of that old Monogram book that were incorrect and I for first would not suggest at all to use it as an historical reference for the topic... we tried to improve research and accuracy in the following 25 or so years, so forgive me if I try to correct info that is not correct, even coming from me.
It is part of the ethic of research, I guess.