|
Re: Helmut wicks 2 17/5 unclaims
Johannes,
Dr Prein in his JFV series list all of Wick's 56 claims of which the 4 you have listed are not included. Of the 56 listed he noted 53 with the 'B' saying he has evidence that these were confirmed. The 3 not marked this way were his first on 22 Nov 39, one of his 3 claims on 11 Aug 40 and a claim 16 Aug 40. I suggest that these 4 claims were not confirmed (i.e. rejected) rather than being unconfirmed.
Also of note is that on Kacha's page for Wick on the internet the 2 Swordfish claims were dated for the 31 May 40. The post here says 17th, you say 19th, Kacha says 31st, which is correct?
Regards,
Craig..
__________________
There is always three sides to an argument, Your's, Theirs and the Truth. Sometimes the Truth is hard to find.
|