Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxim1
Well, no. It seems like Khazanov and Medved have made their own calculations, using the same source.
|
That is strange, because given the uncertainty over which units to include in calculations, there should be at least some discrepancy in independently compiled data. Are you sure you didn't post these tables somewhere else, where one of the two authors could have seen it?
In any case, suddenly a big question mark has appeared over all this data. There is a link to similar threads at the bottom of this one, which is the source of the question. In the "Luftwaffe fighter losses in Tunisia" thread dating from 2005, Christer Bergström wrote that "The website you refer to lists all aircraft above 10 % damage degree." The website in question is Michael Holm's. However, this raises the problem of the significance of the "repair" category. How can it exist if the "combat" and "non-combat" categories include damaged, as well as destroyed, aircraft? Can anyone answer this question?