|
Re: Identity of Ju 88 Sought?
Interesting Ed
Shores et all does not mention this damaged A-10 on April 8th, despite Rommel forcelanding at the same airfield that day in his Storch.
The problem with your theory is that we are basically stuck with the 2F code which as far as I know never was in use by St G 2. If we then just have the Stab/St G 3 to deal with it means that "your" 88 is listed wrongly in GQM loss records.
Is this accident mentioned in NVM or anywhere else?
I agree the British aircraft is a Tomahawk. In April 1941 there were still no Curtiss aircraft at the front in NA, so whoever took the photo did so at a later date.
Cheers
Stig
|