View Single Post
  #6  
Old 3rd March 2013, 18:29
Stig Jarlevik Stig Jarlevik is offline
Alter Hase
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Stig Jarlevik will become famous soon enoughStig Jarlevik will become famous soon enough
Re: Unknown? FW189 loss 23.May.1943

Thanks Andrey

Well if the observer reported both losses it's another matter of course.

Generally what I am saying is not that the observer did not recognise the Fw 189 as such but that he was mixing type numbers, just like someone who is not too familiar with Luftwaffe type numbers could state Fw 109 and Bf 190. You recognise the type as such, but uncertain about the correct type number, you mix them in a field report.

If no Fw 189 losses are found I believe the observer made a mistake

Cheers
Stig
Reply With Quote