View Single Post
  #18  
Old 28th June 2013, 01:20
Observer1940 Observer1940 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 281
Observer1940 is on a distinguished road
Re: Whitley test "produced a failure at 98% of the design load" is that good?

Thank you all for your comments.

Found this http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchi...0-%201470.html but it is 1949. Whitley spec was 1934. I did find an ARC or RAE article, but cannot find it now.

The Captain and crew of a Whitley V survived a forced landing when their tail beam (beam which also holds the rear wheel) failed at the end of July 1940 and within two weeks another occurred at Boscombe Down. By December 1940 a modified tail beam kit had been designed by AW and was being supplied to 4 Group and Contractors. Any weakness appeared to be in the tail.

Later in WW2 a second Whitley tail beam modification was supplied to supersede the first modified Dec 1940 tail beam.

Mark

Last edited by Observer1940; 28th June 2013 at 09:10. Reason: add 1949 and Whitley spec was 1934
Reply With Quote