|
Re: Pilot who shot-down V1 in Kent
Thank you both. Using BC and the unofficial 165 Diary sources (and presuming no one can know any better since BC has done the research) the likelihood is then that it was Watson. This raises a question. Watson's, and every other, claim must have been substantiated by reference to events on the ground. But then these records have probably not survived since BC does not 'tend to tie up events on the ground with events in the air', which implies he did in those cases where it was possible to do so. Agreed? Tony
|