[Skyraider3D]

Quite the contrary, I welcome critique on my work and I appreciate you taking the time to write your findings here. However so far, from my point of view, they merely serve to cast doubt on what I've done and do not help in any way to improve my work. So rather than just speaking your thoughts, please tell me, or if possible show me, what I should change to arrive at an accurate representation of the aircraft shown in the photos I posted.

Yes, that photo shows a G-6 and it's mirorred, as the crew access door and Jumo 213 intakes appear on the wrong sides. When I create a 3D model of an aircraft, I start with a lot of research, so I know what I'm dealing with, but thanks for your concern. I posted this photo as I merely wanted to show you the 'A' on the nose, just like there's one on Tober's machine. I could've easily unmirrored it, but I chose to simply link the original location (not my site) instead, as this was quicker.

There appears to be no scarcity of Ju 88 experts, but concrete answers are hard to come by. So, based on photos and data available to me, I conclude that Tober's machine was WNr 750811, 4R+AS, and this is the machine shown in the three photos I posted. There appears a code on the flame dampers which hold a clue to the identity, but is as yet unclear. Likewise it's not certain if there was a gondola. The A on the nose is clear enough to confirm the identity for me. You evidently disagree with my findings, but I simply do not understand your reasoning. I'd appreciate if you could explain again, in Icelandic if you prefer; I've an Icelandic friend with excellent control of the English language who could translate. Thanks Ed!