Hello Andreas,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken
Further - the same picture for 4./Nachtstaffel where you have the last report before the gap reported on April 30th - and then the next loss reported for April 21st 1943 appear in the GenQu report of May 25th.
|
The enigmatic April/May gap is interesting really. Is it was for all Luftflotte 4 units (or even for Ostfront units in whole) or it was a local phenomenon?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken
For 2.(F)/100 you have the last loss before 'the gap' reported for March 30th 1943, in the report of April 1st 1943. March 1943 is 100% in line between GenQu 6 Abt and Bestand und Bewegungsmeldungen - the same with April 1943 (no incidents).
To me this indicates that we have a 'missing loss' in the same timeframe as for the I./St.G.2.
|
It isn’t a gap but the real absence of losses between the March and 27.5.43 apparently.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken
For example for my main area of interest I have been able to locate so-called Luftlage Einzelmeldungen. These are in fact the original Fernschreiben strips - the paper strips that came out of the telegraph or teleprint machines and were glued to report sheets - pink color! which detail all operations for a given area and date, number of aircraft and their task for the day. All special incidents - claims, losses etc are outlined here.
|
The Luftflotte 4 and I.Fliegerkorps especially are unsuitable command structures for the timeframe in question. I have found the good daily reports of Luftflotte 6 and partly the daily reports of the VIII.Fliegerkorps. But have only the poor daily reports of Luftflotte 4 (even without the number of missions with few exception) and nothing at all from the most interesting for me I.Fliegerkorps and IV.Fliegerkorps. The reports of the Flak units attached to the infantry forces are interesting but specific. The info about Luftwaffe actions in the Heeres and Kriegsmarine documents is valuable but specific also.
Don’t know if the Einzelmeldungen of Luftflotte 4 for the timeframe survived the war.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken
I can not see that there were many units operating Do 217s in the area of Luftflotte 4?
|
Do217 had 1.(F)/Nacht (no losses) and 4.(F)/Nacht only.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken
So we could assign operations and losses of Do 217s if we are to find any to 4. Nacht.
|
What is the sources for the research of Do217s in particular?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken
But for now I find it safe to state that you can use the Bestand- und Bewegungsmeldungen to say that in addition to the losses given in the reports from the GenQu6Abt you have some additional aircraft losses without personnel being killed, wounded or missing in action, which you can not give an exact date for due to missing information.
|
It seems yes.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken
It is also interesting to note that the apparent loss of a Ju 88D-1 by 4. Nacht is a 4.(F)/122 aircraft with (possibly) crew from 4./Nacht (April 10th 1943)
|
Speak by call sign (F6+EM) the aircraft was from 4.(F)/122 indeed but why do you think that the crew was from 4.(F)/Nacht? I thought the info about 4.(F)/Nacht is the obvious error in GQM list.
Probably I made too many messages during a short time
But the theme seems interesting and important really.
Best regards,
Andrey