|
Re: Ju 290A-4, W.Nr. 165
Hi,
I got involved in this topic because I had a reference that said the Ju.290 in questiom was '0196' the discussion here has cleared up that error.
I was not voting on history but on an opinion, as I found too many errors in Greens study of the Ju.90/290/390 series.
But thanks for helping to clear up the 0165 / 0196 error in my files.
Regards
|