View Single Post
  #35  
Old 20th May 2014, 17:41
Andrey Kuznetsov Andrey Kuznetsov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 908
Andrey Kuznetsov will become famous soon enough
Re: Luftflotte 4 losses Apr.-Jun.1943: a comparison of the different data

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andreas Brekken View Post
I have attached a screenshot of an example of a report ...
In the attached document the column "Total über 60%" means (strictly speaking) that 60% damages were counted as repairable. Is it right?
According to all other accounts 60% means the lower limit of the irrepairable damages.

Also, let's return to "Er" mark after % of damages in GQM returns.
If really only total losses and items with "Er" mark were included in columns "durch Feindeinwirkung" and "ohne Feindeinwirkung" in Flugzeugbestand und Bewegungsmeldungen, the difference between losses in the sources in question is even higher than I wrote before.

Surprisingly few Lfl.4 losses during Apr.-Jun.43 has the "Er" mark.

By the way, a strange record on the page 10 on 22.5.43 (record 183): Lfl.2 30.4.43 7./JG77 Bf109G-6 wn 16569 70% (!) with "Er". Is it a typo?

Best regards,
Andrey

Last edited by Andrey Kuznetsov; 20th May 2014 at 19:46. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote