Re: 55. IAP and 67. IAP on 22.06.1941 on the web
The math does not need scientific stanarów. If in one place, someone writes about 40 and the other 17 is what we prove. 2 + 2 = 40 or 2 + 2 = 17?
You have to be able to read the text with understanding, this is a rare art, but instead it is easy to be indignant.
Someone prove scientifically that the number of aircraft in the squadron fighter can reach 40 pieces is pure nonsense. Of course you can specify the size and number of full-time aircraft based on the document, but what for?
The book is written by B. D. does not hold scientific Standards, so what's going on. He writes because he thinks so. I just write because I have more robust data
__________________
Mirek Wawrzyński
|