
11th July 2015, 17:58
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 297
|
|
|
Re: Trying to resolve mystery of crew deaths for 4./KG55 He111 loss of G1+DM on 12.05.40
Hi Larry,
Peter Cornwell and I have discussed this quite entensively before in this forum. It started with the discussion which He111 with a murdered crew was seen by SqnLdr Halahan of No.1 Sqn on his return voyage after being shot down over Belgium. This was then my analysis:
Let's again get back to the original question: which could have been the Heinkel of which Sqn Ldr Halahan supposedly witnessed the decapitasion by Senegalese troops.
What seems to be facts: - Halahan was shot down on May 12 around 09.30 local time by Bf109's of I/JG21
- He came down west of Maastricht, where he said to witness a fight between french and german tanks
- he was reported back to his base at Berry-au-Bac, which is close Reims
- the Heinkel of which the crew was killed landed near the road along which Halahan was returning to Reims
Now it becomes trickier, but let's give it a try: - ·As already suggested, Halahan landed somewhere in the area between Hannut and Waremme, where at that moment the Pz Rgt 5 and 6 had broken through the belgian defenses along the Albert channel. No big tank battles took place on the early morning of the 12th, that would take place on the 13th just west of Hannut against de french Corps de Cavalerie.
- The voyage of Halahan from the Waremme area to Reims was not a short one, and to be able to get back (probably late) on the 13th he must have taken the main roads. However these were full of troops marching up to the front as well as fleeing refugees. To make the trip in 2 days he must have taken the main roads behind the front line. The most logical path is then Waremme-Namur, behind the 9th Army towards Philippeville and then Montherme, then Charleville-Mezieres, and there Vouziers-Reims.
- I checked the French order of battle, and there was only 1 Army that contained a large and distinct contigent of Senegalese troops: The 1st and 3rd Division d'Infanterie Colonial (DIC) of the 2eme Armee. This Army had positions starting on the left side just above Sedan, along the frontier to the east. The 3eme DIC was operational and probably positioned along the frontier, but the 1eme DIC was part of the reserve. Given the situation at the front this unit was probably moved towards the front at Sedan around the 12th or 13th of May
- Now the Heinkel. The list of Heinkel losses on May 12 provided by Peter Cornwell shows that no Heinkel landed in the area just behind the 9eme Armee front west of the Meuse in Belgium. So my conclusion is that it then must have been a Heinkel either in France of on the 13th. For a Heinkel in France that landed along the probable road of Halahan there is one candidate: the machine of 4./KG55.
- This Heinkel, G1+DM, made a fairly intact belly landing at 14.30 on May 12 in Machault, a place right along the route from Vouziers to Reims. The book "Batailles Aeriens and Rupture sur la Meuse" of Jacques Sacre shows a picture of the plane which shows it made a good belly landing.
- However, of the crew (Lt Johannes Juenk, Uffz Ernst Rasper, Uffz Heinz Thoene, Uffz Wilhelm Ege, Gefr Harald Wendt) all but the 2nd were reported killed. Rasper was wounded and made PoW. Now this is strange, that of a plane which made a nice belly landing the whole crew died. To me this is therefore a likely candidate for the incident IF it happened at all.
- There are also KG55 Heinkels that landed roughly in the same area on the morning of the 13th, but none of these have "unexplained" crew faiths.
- One contradiction to be solved then: it seems unlikely that Halahan was at Machault only 4 hours after being shot down, a distance of a few hundred kilometers. My interpretation is that Halahan did not witness it himself, but saw of course the plane, the corpses and probably heard the story from people around. In other words a hearsay story. Interestingly, IF it happened Uffz Rasper should have been able to say something about it.
After this post I was contacted by a descendent of Ernst Rasper, who quoted me the following from a letter of Ernst to his brother:
It was Pentecoste sunday - during the mission the He111 was attacked by 3 planes and "pushed aside" . The radio operator was wounded - the left engine stopped and as the attack went on the pilot was hit deadly in his head. Ernst took over -the other engine caught fire and he turned the plane upside down in order to pretend a fall - which worked as the 3 planes left the scene. As everybody was wounded , nobody could leave the plane and therefore he decided to bring the He111 down. He landed the plane at a grassland, which suddendly appeared in front of them. The crash caused another death - the mechanic and the gunner - the others had been wounded . Ernst and the radio man left the plane - but civilians and french police came shooting to the crashed plane. Both surrendered - and had to go away from the plane into a certain direction. Then the radio man was shot in his rear.
Ernst described furtheron how he survived as a POW.
Interestingly, the local French people that murdered the Bordfunker, later probably invented the cover-up story that colonial troops had done this, probably making convenient use of the fact that these troops indeed passed through the area towards the Sedan front. A nasty piece of history falsification and racism combined.
Anyway, the summary should thus be:
4./KG55 Heinkel He111P. Attacked by Sgt Farnes, Sgt McKay, and Sgt Morfill of No. 501 Squadron south-west of St-Hubert during sortie to bomb rail targets near Rethel. Pursued toward Maubeuge and finally crashed at ‘Buisson Roualet’, near Machault, 2.45 p.m. FF Lt Johannes Junk killed during the Hurricane attacks, BF Uffz Heinz Thöne wounded, after landing and surrendering killed by French civilians, BM Uffz Wilhelm Ege and BS Gefr Harald Wendt killed in the crash landing. BO Uffz Ernst Rasper captured wounded, later returned to his unit. Aircraft G1+DM a write-off.
Regards, Pieter
|