[Clint Mitchell]

Lets be fair Nick? What gave Graham the right to be offended on someone else's behalf just because I am questioning a statement that has been made in this post? Quite a relevant question I might add. I thought that the tone has been quite reasonable considering how these kinds of debates usually spiral into being locked... It's only Graham throwing his toys out of the pram because piece by piece his claims are being shown to be what they truly are. I simply asked for evidence, but it's ok for everyone to make statements with nothing to back up their claims other than what has been previously written in a book or their own misplaced interpretations of black and white photos.

Why am I not allowed a voice?

You can surely understand the frustration when I offer perfectly reasonable and valid points as to why people have misinterpreted the photos yet they still wrongly continue to push their claims. What is the problem here? Are we not allowed to question evidence and debate previous interpretations just because it goes against what someone else thinks is right? It offends them that I have questioned either them or their heroes? What is this?

Nothing I have written in this topic has been intended to be rude or sarcastic in any way. It's a given that I'm no Shakespeare when it comes to adequately communicating my view points in written form and it may be that my literary skills have given the wrong impression, but I meant nothing by it and simply wish to debate this hotly contested issue in a way that is fair to all interested parties and that any claims are backed up with evidence... Which is sadly something that seems to be lacking...