Thanks Björn
Very valuable information indeed. Thanks for the SNCAN numbers and the corresponding RLM WNr!!
Indeed I have also wondered why there would be any connection between Aviolanda and SNCAN (why would RLM issue two WNr for the same aircraft (ie 0044/991). As you quite rightly say, the so called c/n of Aviolanda is now really put into doubt and I am not sure what to do with them.
If Nico Geldhof is correct in his book, Aviolanda used their own c/n up to 73 (the last Do 24 accepted by MLD). Possibly someone then made an educated guess and assumed Aviolanda continued to issue such numbers. If they did, no idea, but the listing in Wijngaarden/Staal's book now seems rather suspect.
Thanks also for confirming the STKZ batch CM+IA to CM+IZ and that it had nothing to do with the SNCAN production.
Moving over to the SNCAN production.
It seems to me the first ones (WNr 991-1001) were CI+GE to CI+GO.
Norbert seems quite adamant that he's got it right....
Any comments on those?
Cheers
Stig