Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrey Kuznetsov
Maybe it was tear and wear loss initially, yes. But it became a total loss in Nov.42, and nevertheless is absent in GQM returns.
|
It could not appear in GQ since the plane left the unit. All presented in the list were marked as 10-90% of damage and Er together with wear and tear planes moved out of the units, scrapped in Tshir, Oblivskaya etc. Thus, in GQ we see only reason and percentage due to that they were withdrawn from the units.
Just tantamount when damaged plane leaves IAP to PARM for repair and further fate of this plane should be traced in PARMs documents.