|
Re: Strange 4./ZG1 claim 12.Mar.43
Hi Andrey
There is no mistake in Tony Woods entry. It was 4./ZG 1, only error(if such) is he has written everything as it appears....perhaps he guessimated the grid reference as being near the one in the line above. However it's not typed out and he has put down the name the handwriting appear to represent, whereas I would have checked 4./ZG 1's losses to check for names that look like the one on the micro film, and checked it against the rank i.e it is a Gefreiter, and such a low rank would suggest a bordfunker anyway. If the claim had been for a bomber, then I might have suspected it was a very low ranking pilot!
Kind Regards
Johannes
|