Dear Ed,
You do realize, I hope, how bizarre some of your statements sound. For instance:
Quote:
|
The electrogravitic discs were used to evacuate that project's scientists, engineers and SS personnel to a base in Antarctica.
|
This is even crazier that the old chestnut that Hitler escaped to Brazil, Argentina, or Antarctica in a U-Boat.
To put this in perspective, while there were enough Jumo 004's available for all the Me 262's being built, the Germans, at the end of the war, lacked the transportation system to get the engines to the assembly facilities. Fuel and transport means were in extremely short supply. The infrastructure of Germany was in shambles. So, you are saying that, at the last minute, things could quite orderly be put in place to evacuate the entire project to Antarctica utilizing these antigravitic discs, which no one in Allied intelligence ever saw?
As for David Master's
German Jet Genesis, David at least treats the subject with a degree of skepticism.
Your message implies a huge and ongoing coverup. If we need an example of super secret history, we only have to look as far as stealth aircraft technology. Sooner or later, for an aircraft to actually be able to be utilized, the wraps have to come off. We've seen it with the F-117. Sure, it was kept under cover for a long time. But, eventually, we got to see what the plane looked like. Logically, if the Germans had something functional and exceptional in terms of conventionally powered flying discs, that technology would have been followed up upon and, certainly, the wraps would have come off of the development ages ago. That never happened.
As for the electrogravitic lifter technology, it appears to be in a very immature state. Whether this could ever be tranformed into an actual heavy lift capability, only time will tell. Your proposition is that, not only did the Germans work on it, but they matured it into that very practical heavy lift capability in the midst of a war that was very much going south. Then, as a reason why we never were privy to the technology, you proffer the suggestion that the project, in toto, was flown to Antarctica, never ever to be heard from again. Rather convenient, don't you think?
At least we are in agreement that the Admiral Byrd thing sounds, well, less than plausible.
You can't prove your case by saying the evidence went south and disappeared. I could do the same, but it wouldn't be proof.
Ed, I fear that you are so taken with the subject that you may be building a house of cards, a half truth here, an inference there, and an innuendo transliterated into a fact. Go and get the hard evidence and, if it doesn't exist, then save face and back away.
As a comparative example, the story I hear was that Colin Powell wasn't at all happy with the evidence that he was being given to take to the U.N. to make the case for war with Iraq. He threw out much of it, asked for better, then went with the best he had, which wasn't that great. In the end, we know that none of the evidence was worth a damn. Powell is an honorable, but very cautious man. He also played the dutiful soldier, perhaps too much so. So, even with the vast resources of U.S. and British intelligence, we were duped. I believe you have far less at your disposal. Please be very careful.
Regards,
Richard